天美视频

File Photo

About the Authors

Ian Robertson

Ian N. Robertson, Ph.D., S.E., is the Arthur N.L. Chiu Distinguished Professor of Structural Engineering in the University of Hawaii鈥檚 Department of Civil, Environmental and Construction Engineering.

Gary Chock

Gary Chock, S.E., F.SEI, is president of Martin, Chock & Carden Inc., a structural engineering and hazard risk assessment company in Honolulu.

The Honolulu City Council appears to be ready and willing to ignore tsunami safety and emergency procedures.

Two public safety building code requirements are being erased from Bill 65 currently under consideration by the Honolulu City Council.

, Bill 65 would adopt the State Building Code, with amendments, as the Honolulu Building Code.

The bill raises two building safety issues.

Issue No. 1: Tsunami Vertical Evacuation

The prior City and County of Honolulu building code (2020-2023) required tsunami design for all residential and commercial buildings having an occupied floor above 45 feet, equivalent to a roof height of 60 feet. Bill 65 would have set similar requirements, but for residential and commercial buildings with roof height over 90 feet, equivalent to a 10-story building.

This updated requirement would bring the building code into conformance with the Honolulu Department of Emergency Management policy of recommending vertical evacuation when horizontal evacuation to high ground is not possible. As shown in the figure from the DEM website, the recommendation is: 鈥淚n case of a Tsunami Warning, move inland or go to the 4th floor or above in a building at least 10 stories or taller.鈥

Honolulu has had a 鈥渧ertical evacuation鈥 policy in place for many years.

This 鈥渧ertical evacuation鈥 policy has been in place for many years, particularly due to the difficulty with evacuating everyone from areas like Waikiki, Kakaako and downtown to high ground during a tsunami warning. Tsunami design requirements are now a part of the 2018 International Building Code, the basis for the Hawaii State Building Code, so it would be unethical, and expose the city and state to enormous liability, if they were to instruct evacuees to seek refuge in tall buildings during a tsunami warning, but do nothing to ensure that the buildings are designed not to collapse during severe tsunami events.

The City Council appears to be ready and willing to ignore tsunami safety and the city鈥檚 emergency procedures. In a full council hearing on Feb. 28, the nine council members voted unanimously in support of this tsunami design provision. However, in a City Council Zoning Committee hearing on May 22, as requested by the Land Use Research Foundation of Hawaii 鈥 which lobbies on behalf of developers 鈥 all six members of the committee reversed their opinions and voted to remove tsunami design for taller buildings even though they will still be used by the Honolulu Department of Emergency Management for vertical evacuation during tsunami warnings.

This would negate public safety during tsunami events in a major reversal of the prior Honolulu Building Code.

Since the Honolulu City and County Department of Emergency Management relies on vertical evacuation as part of its tsunami evacuation plan, the city should logically and ethically ensure that the design of new high-rise buildings will provide structural integrity during tsunami events. In engineering, safety does not happen by chance, it happens by explicit design.

The City Council wishfully thinking that Oahu will not have a major tsunami is not consistent with the engineering performed for all other natural hazards, such as earthquakes and hurricanes. Perhaps they think they don鈥檛 have to worry about it until after there is a damaging tsunami collapsing buildings and taking hundreds of lives.

Issue No. 2: Hurricane Windborne Debris Protection

During hurricanes, enormous amounts of debris are carried by the wind and act as projectiles impacting the exterior walls, roof, doors and windows of buildings. The 2018 International Building Code and International Residential Code require opening protection for all windows and doors on the exterior of all buildings in a hurricane windborne debris region.

Earlier editions of the IBC and IRC noted that all of Hawaii is a windborne debris region. During Hurricane Iniki, windborne debris was observed in areas of Kauai that were in the 130 mph design wind speed zone, well inland from the coastline. (See map and photo below.)

During a Zoning Committee hearing of Bill 65 on Feb. 7, the committee correctly decided to retain the long-standing building code requirement that any region of Oahu where the design wind speed exceeds 130 mph should be included in the windborne debris region. The Hawaii State Building Code is also based on 130 mph.

During Hurricane Iniki, windborne debris was observed in areas of Kauai that were in the 130 mph design wind speed zone, well inland from the coastline. (Courtesy)

Because of the expense of providing window protection, the Hawaii Legislature funded the development of a Hawaii Residential Saferoom as an alternative to opening protection. This is now included in the Hawaii Building Code Appendix U.

Housing developers in Hawaii are currently complying with this requirement by providing residential saferooms, consistent with Appendix U, in new housing construction where the design wind speed exceeds 130 mph. Developer D.R. Horton estimates that addition of a saferoom costs between $5,000 and $7,500 per house, equivalent to the cost of granite countertops in the kitchen. This would enable occupants to remain safe in their homes during a hurricane. The added safety and peace-of-mind for the homeowner/occupants during future high wind events is priceless.

In the full council hearing on Feb. 28, the council voted unanimously in support of the windborne debris region as anywhere with design wind speed exceeding 130 mph. However, in the Zoning Committee hearing on May 22, as requested by the Building Industry Association of Hawaii 鈥 which is an affiliate of the National Association of Home Builders 鈥 all six members of the committee suddenly reversed their opinions and voted to change to a design wind speed of 140 mph.

This would make the weakened criteria unique to Oahu and contrary to the State Building Code.

The map of Oahu (below) shows how this would exempt most of the new housing construction along the south shore of Oahu (portions of Makakilo, Kapolei, Ewa, Royal Kunia, Waipahu, Mililani, Pearl City, Halawa Heights and Salt Lake) from windborne debris protection.

Gray regions in this map would no longer be required to provide opening protection or saferooms. Some of these gray regions are tiny or taper down to very narrow widths that will be confusing and unenforceable. These problems do not exist with a 130 mph design wind speed.

A map of Oahu shows how a proposed bill for Honolulu would exempt most new housing construction along the south shore of Oahu from windborne debris protection. (Courtesy)

Why the apparent sudden change in City Council member opinions on these two items? Lobbying behind the scenes for months by developers and the Building Industry Association of Hawaii.

To avoid tsunami design of tall buildings and the possible strengthening that might be required, and the need to include saferooms or window protection in new residential construction, these parties are vehemently opposed to these two provisions in Bill 65.  Bill 65 CD2 will have these code provisions erased and tailored to the lobbyists鈥 demands.

Their lobbying was successful in this past Zoning Committee hearing but might not necessarily carry over to the final full council hearing on this bill.

If you are concerned that developer profits are being put ahead of public safety, then you should contact your city council member and insist that they reinstate tsunami design for taller buildings located in the tsunami design zone, and require saferooms or opening protection wherever the hurricane wind speed given in the code exceeds 130 mph.

Community Voices aims to encourage broad discussion on many topics of community interest. It鈥檚 kind of a cross between Letters to the Editor and op-eds. This is your space to talk about important issues or interesting people who are making a difference in our world. Column lengths should be no more than 800 words and we need a photo of the author and a bio. We welcome video commentary and other multimedia formats. Send to news@civilbeat.org. The opinions and information expressed in Community Voices are solely those of the authors and not Civil Beat.


Read this next:

Transition To Renewables Not To Blame For Recent Power Grid Challenges


Local reporting when you need it most

Support timely, accurate, independent journalism.

天美视频 is a nonprofit organization, and your donation helps us produce local reporting that serves all of Hawaii.

Contribute

About the Authors

Ian Robertson

Ian N. Robertson, Ph.D., S.E., is the Arthur N.L. Chiu Distinguished Professor of Structural Engineering in the University of Hawaii鈥檚 Department of Civil, Environmental and Construction Engineering.

Gary Chock

Gary Chock, S.E., F.SEI, is president of Martin, Chock & Carden Inc., a structural engineering and hazard risk assessment company in Honolulu.


Latest Comments (0)

Interesting article which I seems to appeal to the engineers and architects that have some skin in the game. To the layperson it seems almost comical. A safe room, where we can shelter from a hurricane with winds of 130mph? Really, most of the islands old time homes, constructed during the 40-50's, unless modified, won't stand up to any major wind event, that's the reality. Installing a safe room in new construction for what is maybe a once in 100 year event seems like overkill, not profit.On the other hand, I would expect all new Kaka'ako construction to incorporate the doomsday thought of a tsunami, as evidenced by their podium lobby entrances being built well above the street/ground level. Waikiki on the other hand may have issues with some older walk up buildings and some larger, but that's the risk you know you will be in there. For the majority of the island, who really cares about vertical evacuation, it's all ground level disaster ready.

wailani1961 · 7 months ago

It should be pointed out that those who had previously testified to remove tsunami design from residential construction included many structural engineers in our community who ARE NOT Lobbyists. Our testimony included realistic and technical concerns regarding a 芒聙聵blanket芒聙聶 requirement to require developers to bear the burden of a design provision that may not be warranted or appropriate, particularly for residential construction. If anyone is interested in background information as to why the Bill was changed I encourage you to read previous testimony written by seasoned structural engineers (besides Mr Robertson & Mr. Chock) to educate yourselves on our concerns.Our future and continued discussion within SEAOH community should be to collaborate with HiEMA to provide a consistent message for evacuation in the event of a tsunami; provide reasonable expectations for "vertical evacuation" into structures (note, this may not be the appropriate approach); and develop structural design requirements which are reasonable for the building type which will be developed based on the consensus of a majority and reviewed by peers in our industry.

Kuliapachecoboerstler · 7 months ago

Structural Engineers Association of Hawaii (SEAOH) held a Special Voting Meeting on December 6, 2023 to specifically discuss and vote on the proposed Tsunami amendments for use in the upcoming adoption of the City and County Building Code.The vote and decision was to exclude the proposed application of tsunami design requirements to Risk Category II buildings which is in line with the standard recommendations in the model code (2018 International Building Code) and it is not prudent to recommend more stringent design requirements for construction in the City and County of Honolulu without thorough study and deliberation both internally within SEAOH and externally with other Engineering, Construction, and Developer industry partners. As the inclusion of tsunami design requirements to Risk Category II buildings would have an impact on construction cost of affected buildings, additional vetting of the proposed amendments are required to ensure that any additional requirements above and beyond the model and Hawaii State code are reasonable and to minimize the risk of unintended consequences that may arise from a premature issuance.If you have any questions, please contact SEAOH

SteveBaldridge · 7 months ago

Join the conversation

About IDEAS

IDEAS is the place you'll find essays, analysis and opinion on public affairs in Hawaii. We want to showcase smart ideas about the future of Hawaii, from the state's sharpest thinkers, to stretch our collective thinking about a problem or an issue. Email news@civilbeat.org to submit an idea.

Mahalo!

You're officially signed up for our daily newsletter, the Morning Beat. A confirmation email will arrive shortly.

In the meantime, we have other newsletters that you might enjoy. Check the boxes for emails you'd like to receive.

  • What's this? Be the first to hear about important news stories with these occasional emails.
  • What's this? You'll hear from us whenever Civil Beat publishes a major project or investigation.
  • What's this? Get our latest environmental news on a monthly basis, including updates on Nathan Eagle's 'Hawaii 2040' series.
  • What's this? Get occasional emails highlighting essays, analysis and opinion from IDEAS, Civil Beat's commentary section.

Inbox overcrowded? Don't worry, you can unsubscribe
or update your preferences at any time.