Marcia Kimura is a 33-year condominium owner and lifetime Hawaii resident who became active since 2014 in condo owner rights efforts, including advocacy involving legislation.
An open letter to state legislators, industry officials and members of condo boards.
As we look forward to additional years of decision making for legislation, I would like to offer an overview of common sense rights condominium owners can rightfully assert. I hope that you will affix these to your sensibilities relevant to owner efforts to initiate legislation:
1) Most, if not all, condo owners are first Americans who have absolute constitutional guarantees of freedoms, including the rights to own property and freedom of speech that cannot be eradicated or diminished by lesser quasi governments, special interest groups, industry leaders or government officials, no matter their financial status or supposed influence on governing authorities.
2) Freedom of speech rights means that we rightfully cannot be silenced, or our efforts toward just resolution of our grievances stifled by anyone, including attorneys hired by associations, however veiled their intentions are.
We as owners have the absolute right to openly criticize, question, disagree with or hold suspect the actions, policies, beliefs and accusations of anyone in management, or the boards, and their attorneys, without experiencing resulting retaliation by these parties, or arbitrary demands for reimbursement of legal fees from owners, when boards hire these attorneys, unless legal fee reimbursement requirement results from collection of delinquent common dues payments, written consent to payment applicable to each separate matter from the individual owners, or court orders obtained by boards for each separate matter.
3) All elected, contracted and hired management parties in associations are charged with the responsibility of representing the best interests of the owners, collectively. Owners have the express right to hold accountable or suspect the actions of these responsible parties, who may or may not be licensed.
4) As owners, we have the right of timely access to information and documentation of transactions, contracts, policies and statements generated by either management, owners — individually or collectively — contractors and other parties associated with operations, without undue alteration of these materials before receipt by owners.
5) Management and boards are required to reasonably carry out their fiduciary responsibilities while maintaining a policy of transparency and truthfulness in their intentions, before implementing their decisions with irreversible actions. These include establishment of adequate reserve funds that prevent sudden and devastating emergency assessments to individual owners.
Owners have the right to expect that malfunctioning common elements, or association-related damages to individual units be repaired on a timely basis, without the expenses billed exclusively to affected owners.
6) Sustained individual condominium home ownership is to be protected with every legal means available to owners. Owners have the right to an effective means of resolving their grievances and disputes with governing parties, through an impartial agent such as an ombudsman who will receive, investigate and make recommendations for resolution of these matters.
7) Management personnel and boards cannot cause owners financial or psychological duress carried out with the intention, veiled or overt, to deprive them of ownership of their homes in circumstances other than default of association dues. Foreclosure procedures must include proper and timely communication of intended actions to owners subject to the process.
8) As the includes condo attorneys in its definition of collectors to whom the act applies, these attorneys are bound by all its provisions, including the requirement that total collection fees shall not exceed 25% of the total debt collection amounts.
9) The burden of proof for all charges of alleged violations of each condominium’s governing documents is borne solely by the party initiating the violation claim and must be founded on irrefutable evidence consisting of testimonies of expert witnesses, testimonies of third-party eye witnesses not related to or associated with board members, or the accuser, reliable video or audio recordings, or documentation substantiating violations and excluding the sole statement or claim of violation by one party against another.
10) Association violations must be clearly stipulated as enforceable in governing documents, with a written schedule of the range of violation fines that are not subject to varied discretionary imposition by any and all board members, on a per case basis. Owners have the right of protection against selective enforcement of their associations’ codes, covenants and restrictions.
11) Owners have the right to pursue board action against any tenant, or other owner who is in violation of house rules, and a threat to the peaceful enjoyment of  home units.
12) A clear, detailed and itemized explanation of all appropriations of the from the state’s Real Estate Branch and others with access to the funds, should be provided to any and all condominium owners requesting the report. Fund monies should not be used in lobbying actions against the efforts of condominium owners to secure legislation or other means of protection of their rights.
13) Owners have the right to participate in equitable board electoral processes without manipulation or misuse of proxies or other procedures that unfairly and illegally benefit management.
14) Legislators have the obligation and duty to incorporate the needs of their home-owning constituents, nearly half of whom own condominiums in this state, into proactive, protective and enforceable measures.
The ever-increasing percentage of condo home ownership makes it vitally important that legislation to protect the basic rights of owners be established and enforced. Only your continued commitment to these principles assures lasting peace and justice for all parties.
Sign up for our FREE morning newsletter and face each day more informed.
Community Voices aims to encourage broad discussion on many
topics of
community interest. It’s kind of
a cross between Letters to the Editor and op-eds. This is your space to talk about important issues or
interesting people who are making a difference in our world. Column lengths should be no more than 800
words and we need a photo of the author and a bio. We welcome video commentary and other multimedia
formats. Send to news@civilbeat.org. The opinions and
information expressed in Community Voices are solely those of the authors and not Civil Beat.
Marcia Kimura is a 33-year condominium owner and lifetime Hawaii resident who became active since 2014 in condo owner rights efforts, including advocacy involving legislation.
The above is balanced and common sense...which doesn't guarantee acceptance. As a BOD Director for 20+ years and President for 10+, I and the BOD members at our AOAO have worked hard to make thoughtful decisions, to plan effectively for the long term, to communicate clearly and sufficiently and to educate owners on the AOAO situation, what and why decisions are made, and what expectations should be. Most owners seem to believe that we have done a good job. BUT, I would say that getting owner engagement is very hard beyond a core group. People would rather complain than get educated/involved. 5 years ago ALL BOD members were 60+ and we had tried 7-8 years to get new Directors with no results. Then 2 passed and we were unable to make quorum if someone got sick or traveled or worse. We educated owners on the cost of external governance...big $$. We got 4 candidates, 2 older than the BOD! Owners said "...no time", then complained about decisions but rarely understood the issues. While a Director, I worked 50+ hours weeks plus my 2 hour commute. But it was important to me to help manage my community and oversee my investment. Owners HAVE to get involved, educated and "take ownership".
ThoughtfulSenior·
8 months ago
Thanks so much for shedding light on a very dark corner. Change will come fast when private campaign financing and perks are prohibited. Meanwhile, there are powerful lobbies harming the interests of condo owners: insurance Industry, real estate developers and agents, property managers, construction companies etc. As a result, the governor's agencies are biased, deliberately understaffed, and underfunded--including DCCA insurance division, and consumer protection div. (for condo owners). Two branches of government are failing condo owners--legislative and executive. One example is at Hawaii Revised Statutes Section 514B-69 which has criminal penalties for associations or managing agents which withhold certain records from owners. Of course, there is no law enforcement agency which will enforce this law!Courts offer some hope. One example: U.S. District Court Judge Kobayashi struck down a Hawaii Condo law, which protected associations at the expense of owners as to non-judicial foreclosures. The Court:"Because Act 282 benefits a favored group and not a basic societal interest, it does not appear to be enacted for the public good." The case was in 2020--Galima v. AOAO.
solver·
8 months ago
Make sure you read the condo HOA rules. My mother is a realtor and she constantly has condo's making up rules that aren't in writing and she always wins in court if the condo is ignorant enough to take it that far.
IDEAS is the place you'll find essays, analysis and opinion on public affairs in Hawaii. We want to showcase smart ideas about the future of Hawaii, from the state's sharpest thinkers, to stretch our collective thinking about a problem or an issue. Email news@civilbeat.org to submit an idea.