天美视频

Cory Lum/Civil Beat/2022

About the Author

Naka Nathaniel

Naka Nathaniel is an Editor-at-Large at Civil Beat. You can reach him at naka@civilbeat.org.


If real change is to happen, voters and journalists will have to keep up the pressure on state and county leaders.

Civil Beat鈥檚 Blaze Lovell landed a blockbuster piece of investigative journalism on the front page of The New York Times last Wednesday.

He disclosed the attention-grabbing details about how late-night parties in a Honolulu office building were used by politicians to rake in campaign contributions from companies seeking state contracts. 

Lovell, working with data journalists from , painted a picture of our public officials’ betrayal 鈥 this wasn驶t how business was supposed to be done in Hawaii anymore.

鈥淚n 2005, in response to a series of scandals, Hawaii passed a law that barred government contractors from giving money to politicians,鈥 Lovell wrote. 鈥淚t was billed as one of the nation鈥檚 most ambitious efforts to end pay-to-play in contracting and designed to fundamentally change the political culture of a state steeped in corruption. But legislators wrote a loophole into the law, effectively gutting it: The ban would apply only to donations from the actual corporate entities that got contracts, but not to their owners, employees or any related businesses.鈥

This kind of deep reporting can often drive response and create positive change. So, a week later, what鈥檚 been the response?

‘It Is Going To Shock People And Open Some Eyes鈥

Alexander Silvert, a retired federal public defender and author of 鈥淭he Mailbox Conspiracy: The Inside Story of the Greatest Corruption Case in Hawaii驶s History,鈥 admired the article because of the details, statistics and the naming of people.

鈥淚t was a great expose and I think it is going to shock people and open some eyes,鈥 Silvert said. 鈥淏ut, without continued political pressure from the public and more importantly, without continued exposure of these issues by the press, this Legislature has proven it is unwilling and unable to make any sort of meaningful changes.鈥

Are the politicians and corporate leaders feeling the pressure to change their ways?

Federal Public Defender Alexander Silvert.
Alexander Silvert sees the report making a difference 鈥 if voters and journalists keep the pressure on. (Cory Lum/Civil Beat/1019)

鈥淚t’s like speeders, the cops pick off a guy here or there who was speeding, but you continue to speed because how many can they pick off?鈥 Silvert said. 

Things don’t look promising in the short term when it comes to legislative and electoral change.聽

Public election financing legislation was effectively killed this session by the chairman of the House Judiciary Committee, David Tarnas. There鈥檚 a faint chance that could be resurrected by House Speaker Scott Saiki and Senate President Ron Kochi, but the patterns point to continued stifling of change. 

鈥淚s it going to get passed? Probably not, because at the seed of it all is corruption,鈥 said Maki Mourinoue, the chairperson of . The grassroots organization is part of , a coalition advocating for public financing that includes such groups as Common Cause Hawaii, Hawaii Alliance for Progressive Action and Our Hawaii.

鈥業t鈥檚 Going To Take A Grassroots Movement鈥 

As demonstrated in Lovell鈥檚 story, our legislators are pretty good at using the loopholes in the laws that they鈥檝e passed.

And voting the bad actors out? Unlikely this year due to the domination of the Democratic Party in Hawaii.

鈥淭hese big-name Democrats are the ones who are refusing to allow change to happen, they just don’t have an opponent,鈥 Silvert said. 鈥淎nd without a Democratic opponent running in a primary, they鈥檙e going to get reelected.鈥

If true reform is going to come at the ballot box, it probably won’t be until 2026. (Marina Riker/Civil Beat/2022)

So if the legislators won鈥檛 change themselves this year, the first chance to change the legislators will be the next primary cycle in 2026.

鈥淚t’s going to take a grassroots movement behind the scenes to try to get candidates and try to create sort of an alternative Democratic Party within the Democratic Party to put up candidates,鈥 Silvert said. 鈥淎nd I think it’s possible if enough people are fed up. I’m not talking about the general public right now, because you need to have enough influential people who are willing to put the effort forward for two years to galvanize the public in order to lead them to try to make change.鈥

Despite the gloom when it comes to our legislators, Silvert did offer some hope.

鈥淲e also have to be a little bit less pessimistic,鈥 he said. 鈥淭his isn鈥檛 the Deep South in the 鈥60s.鈥

Impact Is Never Immediate

His statement made me think about John Lewis, the civil rights icon. Lewis was the first politician my son met, back when we lived in Atlanta. He was lucky to have a superhero as his representative in Congress. Lewis stood up to the demonic and corrupt politicians by advocating for agitation in the form of 鈥済ood trouble.鈥 

Can we encourage change here in Hawaii?

The type of work Lovell and his colleagues tackled is incredibly difficult. It took months of digging, reporting and editing. 

The people and companies named in Lovell鈥檚 reporting are keeping a low profile.

I驶ve been involved in these types of investigative projects at The Times and the rigor required is consequential. However, the impact is never as immediate as you would hope.

Twenty years ago for The Times, I did an investigative report into the undercovered scourge of sex trafficking. Our efforts didn驶t immediately spur change, but today, if you walk into public restrooms you驶ll often see signs offering help to people that might be trafficked. It took awhile to lead to action, but the first step was awareness.

You don鈥檛 put this effort in to have the status quo continue. 

As of today, it seems the people and companies named in Lovell鈥檚 reporting are keeping a low profile in hopes that this will all go away. After all, it鈥檚 unlikely that clean election legislation will pass this session.

Sometimes, A Lack of Leadership Leads To Tragedy

We can鈥檛 allow leaders to continue with this unethical behavior. If we need a tragic reminder why, there was another released last week from the Fire Safety Research Institute on the Maui fires.

In my University of Hawaii Manoa journalism class last Thursday, I walked my students through the and transcripts. When we reached Aug. 8, 2023, at 5:58 p.m. I choked up reading aloud this desperate call to Maui 911:

鈥淐aller: In Lahaina, people are now in the ocean. Is there a way we can get rescued by boat?

911: Ma驶am we驶re using all our resources to fight the fire.

Caller: We驶re right across the outlet mall.

911: I驶ll put it in that you guys need help in the ocean. How many are there?

Caller: A lot, I would say about 100 people right now.鈥

A hundred people in the ocean fleeing the fires. 

Dispatch would say the Navy and Coast Guard helicopters and boats were at least 20 to 25 minutes away. 

The desperation of those poor people. Lahaina was on fire and there was no way out. The FSRI report clearly demonstrates the failures in leadership. 

At the start of this legislative session, our representatives universally said they would do things differently because of the tragedy on Maui. This would be the chance to learn from mistakes and horror and to be better. That hasn驶t happened.

From the current silence on Lovell鈥檚 reporting that exposes bad behavior, to the Maui report that shows lack of planning and lack of action, it鈥檚 clear that there is much work to be done when it comes to leaders who take responsibility in Hawaii.

Leadership matters because leadership is oftentimes a matter of life or death. It驶s something we sadly now know all too well here in Hawaii.


Read this next:

Chad Blair: Let Us Now Appraise Fallen Bills


Local reporting when you need it most

Support timely, accurate, independent journalism.

天美视频 is a nonprofit organization, and your donation helps us produce local reporting that serves all of Hawaii.

Contribute

About the Author

Naka Nathaniel

Naka Nathaniel is an Editor-at-Large at Civil Beat. You can reach him at naka@civilbeat.org.


Latest Comments (0)

Terms limits helps in so many ways 1) first of all the Legislatures (senate and house members) are not "leaders" but are voted in place as "public servants" . They serve the people of their districts. Instead many are self serving based on their personal bias and self interest. Term limits will address this.2) second, long serving senate and house leaders like Kouchi and Saiki have full control over their houses by wheeling and dealing in committee assignments, office space and budgets for each pet projects.3) third long term Ways and Means senator controls the Senate President by helping to fend off any group trying to get control (via budget $$ to supporters)

OBIKNOBI · 8 months ago

Thanks Naka & yr insightful commenters. Add another track that your students might explore. While focused on elected officials, we should consider their retinue: appointed officials (aren't voted in/out) & their policies (which persist afterwards). Seemingly reasonable, esp. at a point in time, they aren't adaptable: while local culture of either party is averse to change. Marvin Harris studied how long-term societal interests are served by incentivizing best-case scenarios while prepared for worst. Our local policies prepare for the best & invite the worst, by measuring efficiency in $ the better to report expenses, fix staffing levels, set performance standards, et al. Strip redundancy, raise productivity, all save $ but gravitate to best case scenarios as status quo. ("Why so many firemen if big fires 1x an election cycle"). Operate like business makes a nice campaign sticker but business can fail while gov't should not.Facing a major problem, workers hew to a now inadequate "Book"; doing otherwise is unwise in "kill the messenger" mode. Elected & appointed leaders point to the wreck & Da Book: "hands tied, we did all we could". We must address officials and their spoor.

Kamanulai · 8 months ago

There's an obvious problem of corrupt politicians. And yes, investigative journalism can serve as a check against them.But Naka, it also has to be said: Not all journalists & media outlets will use their platform & influence in a conscientious manner. Haven't we all seen this before, nationally & locally? Stories that get reported with a slanted angle. Or just as important: those stories that don't get reported on at all. As if it never happened.Another thing: I'm not comfortable with the amount of times where someone on the news reporting side of things, will later be on "the other side." Positions as spokespersons, communications directors, media relations...whether they be for a politician, a campaign, a govt. dept., a private company...do these career paths impact the way a reporter goes about their job? Was any favor granted to help secure a plum position? We would like to think the answer is "no." But is that always the case?Guess what I'm trying to say is: while there are many good journalists working in the field, there are a few who are primarily looking out for #1. And those bad apples w/a press badge also contribute to the dysfunction that is happening around us.

KalihiValleyHermit · 8 months ago

Join the conversation

About IDEAS

IDEAS is the place you'll find essays, analysis and opinion on public affairs in Hawaii. We want to showcase smart ideas about the future of Hawaii, from the state's sharpest thinkers, to stretch our collective thinking about a problem or an issue. Email news@civilbeat.org to submit an idea.

Mahalo!

You're officially signed up for our daily newsletter, the Morning Beat. A confirmation email will arrive shortly.

In the meantime, we have other newsletters that you might enjoy. Check the boxes for emails you'd like to receive.

  • What's this? Be the first to hear about important news stories with these occasional emails.
  • What's this? You'll hear from us whenever Civil Beat publishes a major project or investigation.
  • What's this? Get our latest environmental news on a monthly basis, including updates on Nathan Eagle's 'Hawaii 2040' series.
  • What's this? Get occasional emails highlighting essays, analysis and opinion from IDEAS, Civil Beat's commentary section.

Inbox overcrowded? Don't worry, you can unsubscribe
or update your preferences at any time.