Lynne Matusow is a long time Honolulu condominium owner and serves on the board. She is active in the community and served on the Chinatown/Downtown Neighborhood board for 27 years.
The passage of proxy voting legislation would put all associations in a precarious position.
Without proxies given to the board, many association meetings may not have quorum if these options are removed. The larger management companies report a majority of associations that met in the first two months of this year that had a quorum prior to the meeting would not have had a quorum if there were no board majority/equal proxies turned in.
No quorum means no meeting. No meeting means no election. No meeting means board members will continue to serve until the next annual meeting. No meeting means a tax resolution cannot be adopted.
This resolution provides that any excess of membership income over membership expenses for the for the tax year shall be applied against the subsequent tax year member assessments as provided by IRS Revenue Ruling 70-604. If the resolution is not adopted, associations may be required to pay tax on income that would not otherwise be taxable.
Condos are peoples homes. In many instances this is their largest investment. will eliminate an owner鈥檚 choice to select board majority on a proxy. will eliminate an owner鈥檚 choice to select board majority/board equal on a proxy and require that all standard proxy forms include a 鈥渄isclosure statement informing unit owners that an association may conduct direct elections by electronic, machine, or mail voting.鈥
A statement of this nature should not be made mandatory on all standard proxy forms because it is confusing and misleading. It implies that owners may vote in all elections by electronic, machine, or mail voting, when the fact is that electronic, machine, and mail voting may be utilized only under the circumstances described in HRS Section 514B-121(e).
Both bills must be defeated.
Owners express confidence in their board by exercising their choice for board majority or board equal.
Often they do not know the names of the board members or their neighbors. Often they do not know who will be attending the meeting.
Quorum Problems
There are almost 400 units in my building. Seventy or so owners, less than 20% of the membership, attended the 2023 annual meeting. Without the proxy options, we would not have had quorum.
At my association鈥檚 annual meeting owners have suggested amendments to the governing documents. Two recent amendments banning smoking on the property and regarding responsibility for repairing and replacing the window walls (glass and frames) were the result of owner concerns at annual meetings.
The latter received the requisite approval of 67% of owners in less than eight weeks. Had their been no quorum there would not have been a meeting nor discussions leading to these provisions.
My association does an independent reserve study every three years, as required by state law. This results in adequate portions of maintenance fees dedicated to reserves, obviating the need for large financial assessments that would place a burden on the owners, especially seniors and others on fixed incomes.
This year approximately 45% of our maintenance fees are dedicated to reserves and the balance to operating expenses. If other associations are not following the law and keeping reserves at low levels it is because of pressure from the homeowners, who do not want to pay more in maintenance fees.
The many associations with hundreds of thousands of owners who are following the law should not be penalized by the actions of the few.
The passage of these two bills will put all associations in a precarious position. They must be defeated.
Sign up for our FREE morning newsletter and face each day more informed.
Community Voices aims to encourage broad discussion on many
topics of
community interest. It鈥檚 kind of
a cross between Letters to the Editor and op-eds. This is your space to talk about important issues or
interesting people who are making a difference in our world. Column lengths should be no more than 800
words and we need a photo of the author and a bio. We welcome video commentary and other multimedia
formats. Send to news@civilbeat.org. The opinions and
information expressed in Community Voices are solely those of the authors and not Civil Beat.
Lynne Matusow is a long time Honolulu condominium owner and serves on the board. She is active in the community and served on the Chinatown/Downtown Neighborhood board for 27 years.
I'm glad the author's association operates ok under the existing quorum laws. However, allowing blanket proxies, even for quorum only, solicited and given to the board by absent owners enables far too many boards and associations to run amuck. The rules need to be changed so that all owners are better represented. If owners were actually required to be present at the annual meeting, or else give their proxy to a specific individual, then issues with HOA's running roughshod over owners would be greatly reduced. It's a red herring, in my opinion, to say that HOA's would not be able to get a quorum at their annual meeting without board proxies and that meetings would have to be cancelled and the existing board stay for another year. That's misleading. If actual attendance or designated proxies were required by law then you bet the board and HOA would inform the owners of this and, voila, more owners would attend or give proxy to a neighbor they trust. Also, it's 2024, the laws and HOA bylaws should allow a method for owners to attend the meeting and vote remotely. Too many big HOA companies and vested boards try to sway this issue from away reality. Change it.
Hawaii_Swimmer·
11 months ago
As I read the bill 2404 in its latest form, proxies are eliminated. As I have witnessed wrongdoing due to concentration of power by individuals holding proxies, I say good riddance! Instead redefine quorums, and as amended in the latest version, authorize mail in and/or electronic voting. Add language requiring attorney certification of language subject to vote for conformance to statute, declaration and bylaws.
DeW·
11 months ago
Any system in place has the potential for abuse. The problem is with the majority of owners not being involved. Maybe it is too difficult to attend the meetings, owners do not live in Hawaii, kids/work schedule etc.?Is it possible to record the meetings, have a summary of what to vote on, and an electronic poll or way to vote, via email that the association has on file for the owner? Give owners 7 days to vote.In my opinion, there's better ways to solve problems than changing laws. One size doesn't fit all.Just thinking out loud.
IDEAS is the place you'll find essays, analysis and opinion on public affairs in Hawaii. We want to showcase smart ideas about the future of Hawaii, from the state's sharpest thinkers, to stretch our collective thinking about a problem or an issue. Email news@civilbeat.org to submit an idea.