Danny De Gracia: The Feds Must Honor The Pottery Barn Rule
The military broke Oahu’s water supply, so now it’s got to pay to fix it.
December 4, 2023 · 7 min read
About the Author
Danny de Gracia is a resident of Waipahu, a political scientist and an ordained minister. Opinions are the author’s own and do not necessarily reflect Civil Beat’s views. You can reach him by email at dgracia@civilbeat.org or follow him on Twitter at .
The military broke Oahu’s water supply, so now it’s got to pay to fix it.
When Hawaii Gov. Josh Green announced last week that up to聽聽will be available for use by the Honolulu Board of Water Supply in the wake of the Red Hill water crisis, he added a powerfully reassuring statement:聽
鈥淭he BWS鈥 decision to raise water rates by about 50% may create a hardship for many residents. It鈥檚 important for the BWS to take advantage of federal funding to reduce the costs it passes on to Oahu residents. My administration is focused on partnerships and solutions.鈥
Thank you, Gov. Green. God bless you.
Being in politics is all about deftness, three-dimensional chess, hypervigilance to see things others cannot see and the uncommon gift of reading between the lines.
So, in case you missed it, this beautiful announcement of EPA money essentially means that on Oahu is in full effect. I translate this policy as: 鈥淵ou break it, you buy it, because we ain鈥檛 paying for something that the federal government did to us.鈥
Yes, this kind of cause and effect of “the person who breaks is the person who pays to replace it” is only common sense for those of us who live in the real world. It is not, sadly, always common sense in Hawaii policymaking circles. In post-plantation Hawaii, there are people in corporate business (and/or public-private partnerships) who think that payment for 鈥渕istakes鈥 should always be socialized and profits for 鈥渟uccess鈥 should always and only be privatized.
Meaning, if the power company鈥檚 downed lines may have started a fire that burned down a town, guess what, 鈥淪igh, sorry, are gonna have to pay for fix it.鈥
Meaning, if the U.S. Navy contaminates the civilian water supply, guess what? 鈥淪igh, sorry, you residents are gonna have to pay to fix that.鈥
I love how the solution to everything that鈥檚 wrong in Hawaii is 鈥渟igh, guess we鈥檙e gonna have to make the public pay more, because, you know, we have to raise that money somehow. We can鈥檛 count on others. We just have to stick our people with it, instead.鈥
That鈥檚 not how you treat democratic citizens of the United States of America. That鈥檚 how you treat serfs on a feudal plantation. This is a pattern, and you鈥檒l find that nearly everything in Hawaii is a one-trick pony of 鈥渟end the profits to the companies, send the bill and bad news to the public.鈥
I鈥檓 so thankful to the Green administration for siding with the ratepayers of Hawaii when it comes to water. Mark this as a great moment in our history, because it sets a precedent more than anything else that responsibility is a unique concept; it may be delegated but it always must no matter what.
The Federal Government Has More To Do
But let鈥檚 not stop there. The fact of the matter is that the federal government has a long-term historic responsibility for protecting, preserving, and supporting the environment in Hawaii. Hawaii did not just 鈥渁ccidentally鈥 become the 50th state; the agricultural, geopolitical, and military significance of the Hawaiian islands were critical to the federal government from annexation to territory to statehood, and this has left negative enduring legacies in its wake.
No, this is not an anti-American sentiment. In fact, I鈥檓 proud to be an American, and I鈥檓 grateful to live in Hawaii. And it鈥檚 because I鈥檓 proud to be an American, that I recognize that when Americans mess something up, Americans fix it and leave it in a better condition than we found it as our pattern of governance.
The Navy didn鈥檛 just start contaminating Hawaii with Red Hill. It’s been doing it for decades. Native Hawaiians are fully justified in their rage about the military鈥檚 use of various parts of Hawaii for bombing throughout the years. But good governance is always first and foremost transactional. When you take something, you replace something. When you break something, you fix something.
When my father was the commander of the U.S. Air Force 633rd Medical Group at Andersen AFB, Guam, from 1990 to 1992, one of the things that the U.S. military did to enhance relations with the locals was giving every commander the responsibility of 鈥渁dopting鈥 a village.
That meant that my dad and his fellow airmen 鈥 along with other units 鈥 would go into the community and build free infrastructure for them, clean up debris and trash whenever necessary and provide free food, medical care, and around this time of year, .
In other words, the federal government recognized its responsibility to take care of people who couldn鈥檛 take care of themselves, and worked to add value for local residents so that they wouldn鈥檛 have to be responsible for all the heavy lifting or hardship themselves.
Revolutionary concept, I know. Some of my conservative friends may characterize that as 鈥渉andouts鈥 or 鈥渟ocial welfare鈥 but it鈥檚 not, it鈥檚 called taking initiative and setting an example so that people can have a functional government.
To be honest, the federal government, and the U.S. military in particular, needs to be as generous and helpful in Hawaii as they were when we were trying to court foreign countries as allies during the global “war on terror.” We built schools, clinics, running water systems, sewage treatment and did all that for the countries that hosted us.聽Imagine if we did the same here on Oahu.聽
We the people are not your last resort to pay for other people鈥檚 mistakes.
We have a good start with Red Hill, but we need the federal government to take a bigger role in protecting and preserving and supporting the environment and the people who live here.
鈥淲hy should the military pay, Danny?鈥 They should pay because it鈥檚 the right thing to do. It is morally despicable to make impoverished locals pay to clean and source their own drinking water when they鈥檙e not the ones who contaminated it. (And I seriously question the patriotism of bureaucrats who refuse to take a proposal to raise rates off the table.)
It is reprehensible to make struggling locals entirely responsible for reversing ecological damage that the Federal Government has brought to the Hawaiian islands. Sure, they didn鈥檛 do all of it, but they did enough of it, and the Pottery Barn rule applies.
When we start demanding that the right people and the right entities pay and take responsibility, we鈥檒l set an example for our own citizens and keiki to follow. We the people are not your last resort to pay for other people鈥檚 mistakes.
Sign up for our FREE morning newsletter and face each day more informed.
Read this next:
The Sunshine Blog: The Hawaii Board Of Education Could Use Some Sunshine
By The Sunshine Editorial Board · December 5, 2023 · 7 min read
Local reporting when you need it most
Support timely, accurate, independent journalism.
天美视频 is a nonprofit organization, and your donation helps us produce local reporting that serves all of Hawaii.
ContributeAbout the Author
Danny de Gracia is a resident of Waipahu, a political scientist and an ordained minister. Opinions are the author’s own and do not necessarily reflect Civil Beat’s views. You can reach him by email at dgracia@civilbeat.org or follow him on Twitter at .
Latest Comments (0)
All I can say is, "AMEN". Thanks for calling it like it is. Democratic power requires an equal portion of responsibility, or have we abdicated that principle as well?
Tropicgal · 1 year ago
The "Pottery Barn rule" of "you break it, you own it" goes back to former National Security Adviser and Secretary of State Colin Powell talking about invading Iraq. I recall that Pottery Barn made a public statement saying that they have no such policy and that accidental damage to products in the stores are absorbed by the company, not passed on to the individual customer.
Rip_Winkle · 1 year ago
Redhill is not the cause of most of the 50% increase announced by the board of water supply. Most of that 50% increase is just to tread water (pun intended) repairing the aged 2000 miles of water infrastructure. A major break occurs on average every day 365 days a year. Less than 20 miles of this 2000 mile infrastructure is actually replaced every year. At this rate you will never catch up to the need. Redhill adds a whole other dimension to the cost. And yes, the navy should pay that cost. And they should pay to remove those tanks, so the underlying toxins that have been leaking for years into the rock can be removed. Mark my words, the Navy will resist that because that芒聙聶s where most of the cost is
manetta48 · 1 year ago
About IDEAS
IDEAS is the place you'll find essays, analysis and opinion on public affairs in Hawaii. We want to showcase smart ideas about the future of Hawaii, from the state's sharpest thinkers, to stretch our collective thinking about a problem or an issue. Email news@civilbeat.org to submit an idea.