天美视频

PF Bentley/Civil Beat/2014

About the Author

Russell Ruderman

Russell Ruderman is a former state senator and Big Island business owner. He writes about state and county politics, business, agriculture and the local food industry. Russell lives in Kea鈥檃u with his wife and daughter. Opinions are the author’s own and do not necessarily reflect the views of Civil Beat. You can reach him at russellruderman@gmail.com.


Utilities complain about the cost but the cost of not undergrounding electrical lines is often even higher.

Can we afford to not place utility lines underground?

After most disasters, one of the longest lasting issues for most people is loss of power. What we see in Lahaina now as crews work to restore power poles is the same problem we saw in Puna after Hurricane Iselle in 2014. Same with Hurricane Iniki on Kauai in the 90鈥檚.

Restoring power can take days, weeks, or months. During this time life is not normal, safe or healthy, as refrigerators don鈥檛 work, internet doesn鈥檛 work, medical devices won鈥檛 function, and many other creature comforts and safety systems are lacking.

Power companies often say that they just can鈥檛 afford to put utilities underground. It鈥檚 too expensive they say. In the past this may have been true, though short-sighted.

I would say, expensive compared to what? Compared to the massive cost of replacing all the poles in an emergency? Compared to the economic and personal loss for those people and businesses doing without power?

While I don鈥檛 have reliable figures for you (no one does), it seems the cost of doing things as we do now is 10 times to 100 times what underground utilities would cost.

In any wealthy new development, utilities are put underground. This improves the view as well as the safety and the resilience of the development. In many many other countries — and some states and counties — underground utilities are standard.

It may be easier to repair lines the old-fashioned way, the way we鈥檝e done it for a long time. Or maybe not, we don鈥檛 know.

But if the lines were underground, most repairs would be unnecessary right now, businesses could reopen, homes can be made livable again quickly.

School children walk over downed power lines to board bus in the Paradise Park section of Puna on August 12, 2014.
School children walk over downed power lines to board a bus in the Paradise Park section of Puna on the Big Island in 2014 after Hurricane Iselle toppled utility poles. (PF Bentley/Civil Beat/2014)

My question is: when will we learn?

In some places, the ground is rocky and making the change is costly and time consuming. In other places, it鈥檚 really no big deal. And in all places, we utility consumers deserve the best, most reliable, and most reasonable utilities possible.

All these calculations assume that power lines did not cause fires on Maui, and still — undergrounding of utilities is the best, most economical option.

Now what happens if power lines did cause some of the fires? In that case, these calculations become trivial compared to the actual cost — $5 billion in losses on Maui, and hundreds of homes gone, in addition to the many, many deaths? The economic devastation that will last years? One doesn鈥檛 have to be a rocket scientist to see the economic benefits of underground utilities anymore.

Wildfires, hurricanes and other natural disasters are increasing in frequency and severity due to climate change, and this is not going to get better.

The people of Maui deserve all our support. But let鈥檚 also take concrete action to prevent a reoccurrence. Put the lines in the ground like modern, safety-oriented utilities do.


Read this next:

Money Continues To Pour In For Maui's Recovery


Local reporting when you need it most

Support timely, accurate, independent journalism.

天美视频 is a nonprofit organization, and your donation helps us produce local reporting that serves all of Hawaii.

Contribute

About the Author

Russell Ruderman

Russell Ruderman is a former state senator and Big Island business owner. He writes about state and county politics, business, agriculture and the local food industry. Russell lives in Kea鈥檃u with his wife and daughter. Opinions are the author’s own and do not necessarily reflect the views of Civil Beat. You can reach him at russellruderman@gmail.com.


Latest Comments (0)

There's a difference between burying new lines installed in new developments, and taking existing pole-mounted infrastructure in existing developments and putting it underground. For new construction, yes, it's hard to see installing poles, when at the same time excavation is being done to build new roads and install water and sewer pipes, conduits could also be installed for electricity distribution as well as for internet, phones, TV, and other communication. The marginal cost of burying the electrical infrastructure is likely on the same order as installing it on new poles. The same math probably applies to rebuilding Lahaina. But replacing existing pole-mounted infrastructure is far different, and far more expensive, requiring things like digging up existing roads and disrupting existing services. and the digging must be done much more carefully because of existing infrastructure like water and sewer lines, raising the cost of digging. Hardening the existing pole-mounted infrastructure should also be considered in such cases.

Rob · 1 year ago

Thank you, Mr. Ruderman well said. Human lives are more important than your return on investment, HECO. Burying lines has been done on the mainland at a relatively low cost to the ratepayer. See: San Diego Gas and Electric. Hawaii, it is time.

lilamarantz · 1 year ago

What this article fails to mention is that Hawaiian Electric has made massive investments in its infrastructure. But these investments have been primarily focused on renewable energy. Since 2010, HECO has invested $2 billion in renewables...investments driven by Hawaii's Clean Energy Initiative.This is relevant because utilities can't simply raise rates to pay for increases in expenses. So, investments in renewables means that less can be spent on more practical matters like burying lines.It's easy, in the wake of Lahaina, to say that HECO should have spent money burying power lines. But the reality is that this was just not anyone's focus. HECO spent money trying to prevent a climate change crisis in the future (curious, given the small carbon footprint of Hawaii), but did not spend to prevent the impacts of climate change today.Hopefully this will change in the future. But for this to happen, the public will need to bear the brunt of these expenses.

FutureNihon · 1 year ago

Join the conversation

About IDEAS

IDEAS is the place you'll find essays, analysis and opinion on public affairs in Hawaii. We want to showcase smart ideas about the future of Hawaii, from the state's sharpest thinkers, to stretch our collective thinking about a problem or an issue. Email news@civilbeat.org to submit an idea.

Mahalo!

You're officially signed up for our daily newsletter, the Morning Beat. A confirmation email will arrive shortly.

In the meantime, we have other newsletters that you might enjoy. Check the boxes for emails you'd like to receive.

  • What's this? Be the first to hear about important news stories with these occasional emails.
  • What's this? You'll hear from us whenever Civil Beat publishes a major project or investigation.
  • What's this? Get our latest environmental news on a monthly basis, including updates on Nathan Eagle's 'Hawaii 2040' series.
  • What's this? Get occasional emails highlighting essays, analysis and opinion from IDEAS, Civil Beat's commentary section.

Inbox overcrowded? Don't worry, you can unsubscribe
or update your preferences at any time.