Hawaii Weighs In On Proposed Marine Sanctuary For Remote Pacific Islands
NOAA heard strong support for expanded protections, but others implored the agency to preserve economic opportunities for U.S. territories.
NOAA heard strong support for expanded protections, but others implored the agency to preserve economic opportunities for U.S. territories.
Several dozen community members gave an array of impassioned feedback Wednesday evening on President Joe Biden鈥檚 proposal to create a new Pacific marine sanctuary that would be one of the largest protected areas on the planet.
Most of those attending the first in a series of scoping meetings led by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration this month across the Pacific spoke strongly in favor of creating a new 770,000-square-mile .
They said the move would help protect imperiled fish, sharks, sea turtles and marine mammals in the Pacific against a triple threat of climate change, pollution and invasive species. It鈥檚 part of a broader effort on both the federal and international levels to protect some .
The distant atolls, reefs and shoals at the center of those remote ocean swathes 鈥渟how what our planet can look like with proper stewardship and restoration,鈥 said Suzanne Case, former chair of the state Department of Land and Natural Resources under Gov. David Ige. 鈥淎ll of the Pacific Remote Islands including Palmyra Atoll merit the full protection by all means.鈥
The protected areas are hundreds of miles to the south and west of Hawaii 鈥 鈥渇ar from any of the local communities with traditional fishing in the Pacific,鈥 Case said.
The sanctuary as proposed would expand upon the existing Pacific Remote Islands Marine National Monument. If designated, it would be larger than the Papahanaumokuakea Marine National Monument in the Northwestern Hawaiian Islands.
However, others at the meeting cautioned against expanding the boundaries of the protected area, which they said would harm the economic prospects of U.S. territories in the Pacific that are often neglected.
Esther Kiaaina, a former Department of Interior undersecretary for insular affairs under President Obama, told the panel of NOAA and White House officials that some federal agencies 鈥渉ave shown more concern about the protection of natural resources and ocean resources than the actual welfare and quality of life for the Indigenous peoples who live in these areas.鈥
She said that the Interior Department had put a lot of thought into limiting the boundaries around Howland and Baker islands, plus Palmyra Atoll and Kingman Reef, to 50 nautical miles when creating the monument. The sanctuary proposes extending those boundaries out to the full 200 nautical miles controlled by the U.S.
Kiaaina, who鈥檚 now a Honolulu City Council member representing Windward Oahu, further urged NOAA to foster more economic opportunities for the Pacific U.S. territories, including Guam, the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands and American Samoa, if the federal agency moves ahead with the new sanctuary.
That could include creating new aquaculture programs for better food security, she said. Kiaaina testified in her individual capacity, not as a council member.
who advises Biden as chair of the Council on Environmental Quality, also attended Wednesday鈥檚 scoping meeting.
鈥淢y main job here today is listening and learning from all of you,鈥 she said. 鈥淭his region is crucial to the health and sustainability of our planet鈥檚 marine ecosystem, but it鈥檚 facing significant and urgent challenges鈥
Kitty Simonds, executive director of the Western Pacific Regional Fishery Management Council, also attended but did not testify.
Wespac hasn鈥檛 yet reviewed the latest sanctuary proposal, but the council has consistently and staunchly Pacific monuments and sanctuaries in the past.
鈥淲e support the process, but we want to make sure they include commercial fishing in their goals and objectives,鈥 Simonds said after Wednesday鈥檚 meeting.
鈥淚 had hoped that Hawaii longline industry members would have come to this and participated in person, but I鈥檓 sure 鈥 they鈥檙e going to have their comments,鈥 she added.
, a Wespac pelagic fisheries ecosystem scientist, said the U.S. purse seine fleet based in American Samoa rarely fishes in the expanded waters proposed for the sanctuary.
Nonetheless, those waters could become important fishing areas for the American Samoa fleet in future years as the international community negotiates pacts on where different fleets can fish within the Pacific, Fitchett said. Currently, there are 11 active purse seiner vessels out of American Samoa, he said.
William Aila, a member of the pro-sanctuary and former head of DLNR, asked NOAA to listen closely in their subsequent scoping meetings to the residents of the U.S. territories 鈥 not just to the government leaders there who鈥檝e voiced concerns against the sanctuary.
鈥淣ot everyone equates natural resources to dollars,鈥 Aila said. 鈥淣ot everyone is concerned only about economic opportunities. There are still those elders in those areas that believe in the values that are very similar to our values here in Hawaii.鈥
鈥淭hat鈥檚 not a surprise because we鈥檙e all connected by our ancestors who sailed through those waters, (for) many, many thousands of years,鈥 he added.
The next scoping meeting is scheduled to take place on Wednesday in Hilo. NOAA will then head to to gather local feedback there. Those who don’t get a chance to attend can also comment online by visiting and typing in the docket number: NOAA-NOS-2023-0052.
Sign up for our FREE morning newsletter and face each day more informed.
Support Independent, Unbiased News
Civil Beat is a nonprofit, reader-supported newsroom based in 贬补飞补颈驶颈. When you give, your donation is combined with gifts from thousands of your fellow readers, and together you help power the strongest team of investigative journalists in the state.
About the Author
-
Marcel Honor茅 is a reporter for Civil Beat. You can email him at mhonore@civilbeat.org