Denise Antolini is a professor of Law with the Environmental Law Program at the William S. Richardson School of Law, University of Hawaii Manoa. She has served as the volunteer president of Malama Pupukea-Waimea, a marine stewardship nonprofit on the North Shore of Oahu, since 2005.
Uilani Naipo is a cultural and natural resource advocate from Milolii on Hawaii island. She is a lineal descendant of Milolii, South Kona, known as 鈥淭he Last Hawaiian Fishing Village,鈥 and serves as a voice of the kupuna (seen and unseen), the ohana of Milolii, and Kalanihale for the Milolii Community-Based Subsistence Fishing Area that recently established fishing rules for the Kapalilua district of South Kona.
Summer is just a month away, bringing an increased burden on communities and natural resources.
The Hawaii State Legislature is at the precipice of approving groundbreaking legislation called the 鈥渧isitor impact fee鈥 that would provide hundreds of millions of dollars for urgently needed investments in our cultural and natural resources.
A $50 impact fee is supported by nearly two-thirds of Hawaii鈥檚 voters who strongly agree that we all share the kuleana to protect our resources for future generations.
The visitor impact fee bill, , is being considered by a legislative conference committee this week. Unfortunately, an eleventh-hour proposal has emerged to water down this landmark legislation and instead pass only a 鈥渟tudy it more鈥 bill.
But have already been done. No additional studies are needed to prove that many of our communities, agencies, and the Department of Land and Natural Resources are underfunded to support the current impacts of tourism.
Summer is just a month away, bringing an increased burden on our communities and our natural resources. Communities and DLNR need immediate support for restoration and management projects that build on management initiatives we have seen succeed at Haena on Kauai, on Maui at Waianapanapa, and on Oahu at Hanauma Bay.
Plenty of legislative hearings have aired all the issues, generating testimony from hundreds of community members, agencies, and organizations that recognize the urgent need for the proposed visitor impact fee.
DLNR, the Hawaii Tourism Authority, the Office of the Attorney General, the Hawaii Climate Change Mitigation and Adaptation Commission 鈥 and more 鈥 all support these efforts and are ready to get to work now to implement the visitor impact fee program and ensure monies collected offset visitor impacts to our precious parks, reefs, beaches and trails.
Ask any community suffering from over-tourism 鈥 鈥渘o need mo鈥 study!鈥 Visitor levels have bounced back, but, despite destination management plans, funding for protecting impacted natural and cultural resources and communities has not.
“Overwhelmingly Approved”
Many visitors are shocked by the poor condition of what were once some of our most spectacular natural areas. Shameful.
We ask the Legislature to take action, this session, to enact the Hawaii Visitor Impact Fee program now. Visitor fees are successfully used in various parts of the world to raise funds to protect natural resources impacted by tourists.
As submitted, SB 304 would charge non-resident tourists $50 for an annual pass to enjoy Hawaii’s iconic beaches, reefs, forests, and trails, raising hundreds of millions of dollars for government and communities to manage and soften the impacts of 10 million visitors a year to our islands.
This approach works!
Senate President Ron Kouchi has applauded successful fee collection programs at Haena on his home of Kauai and Waianapanapa on Maui, saying they are leading the way by implementing visitor impact fees.
SB 304 has been overwhelmingly approved by every legislative committee that has reviewed it this year.
The attorney general has testified and offered many helpful amendments that set this program up for success, including ensuring funds are used to offset visitor impacts at the most trafficked areas, and allowing DLNR to identify areas of need through rule-making.
What are we waiting for?
As time slips by, our natural and cultural resources take the brunt of the uncontrolled tourism arrivals with visitors increasingly driven by social media to remote trails, beaches, and sites.
Aside from a few places that have wisely imposed restrictions such as Hanauma Bay, Diamond Head, and Haena, most of Hawaii鈥檚 spectacular natural and cultural destinations are not sufficiently protected from foot traffic, litter, vehicles, noise, or vandalism.
Plenty of legislative hearings have aired all the issues.
And they do not have adequate infrastructure such as informational signs, gates, restrooms, limitations on human usage, or consistent observation by enforcement authorities.
Hawaii residents pay the price for all those impacts 鈥 either through taxpayer dollars or by degraded recreational opportunities. Better managed beaches, trails, and natural areas not only benefit residents, they also provide visitors with a higher quality experience that many are willing to pay for.
Hawaii deserves the best. The best-managed trails, the cleanest beaches, the most protected cultural sites and coastal ecosystems.
Without more investment, beginning this year, our irreplaceable natural resources that sustain us like our reefs, forests, trails, and more will continue to deteriorate. The quality of life enjoyed by current and future generations depends on the Legislature giving DLNR 鈥 and the communities impacted 鈥 this powerful new legislative framework and tool for protecting and loving the aina.
It is time to turn words into actions.
Sign up for our FREE morning newsletter and face each day more informed.
Community Voices aims to encourage broad discussion on many
topics of
community interest. It鈥檚 kind of
a cross between Letters to the Editor and op-eds. This is your space to talk about important issues or
interesting people who are making a difference in our world. Column lengths should be no more than 800
words and we need a photo of the author and a bio. We welcome video commentary and other multimedia
formats. Send to news@civilbeat.org. The opinions and
information expressed in Community Voices are solely those of the authors and not Civil Beat.
Denise Antolini is a professor of Law with the Environmental Law Program at the William S. Richardson School of Law, University of Hawaii Manoa. She has served as the volunteer president of Malama Pupukea-Waimea, a marine stewardship nonprofit on the North Shore of Oahu, since 2005.
Uilani Naipo is a cultural and natural resource advocate from Milolii on Hawaii island. She is a lineal descendant of Milolii, South Kona, known as 鈥淭he Last Hawaiian Fishing Village,鈥 and serves as a voice of the kupuna (seen and unseen), the ohana of Milolii, and Kalanihale for the Milolii Community-Based Subsistence Fishing Area that recently established fishing rules for the Kapalilua district of South Kona.
Last year, when the legislature decided to keep all of the TAT tax for themselves, they already ultimately added another tax on visitors by the Counties. What happened to all the tourism money that the State now has access to that used to be paid to the counties? That money should be used for the things that were in this bill instead of their own piggy bank.
dancingaroundchaos·
1 year ago
The demise of SB 304 is the right course of action. The People know politicians will squander the money.I am curious why neither of the authors of this piece is mindful of kanaka maoli who live on the mainland now. They would be charged the $50 tourist fee when they return to visit 'ohana and play tourist in their motherland.Yeah the demise of SB 304 is the right thing at the right time.
JuanaPearl·
1 year ago
So someone believes our visitors don't pay their fair share and should be taxed some more. In addition, it should be done in such a way that it should insult them. Other than military, which is also regularly attacked, there is no significant industry in this state, except for service industries that support tourism. Directly and indirectly tourism probably provides two-thirds of the islands non-federal revenue. Most jobs are directly or indirectly in support of tourism. We directly tax them with the highest transient accommodations tax in the nation, those that own homes pay real estate taxes several times higher than residents pay on their primary residence. They pay special additional taxes on rental vehicles. Quite frankly they use little of the government services except for roads and parks.Then you arrive at a particularly insulting head tax. I'm a resident and am thankful for the fact that our beautiful state brings visitors that pay our wages and most of our taxes. Sure, some visitors are rude, but most are really nice people.
IDEAS is the place you'll find essays, analysis and opinion on public affairs in Hawaii. We want to showcase smart ideas about the future of Hawaii, from the state's sharpest thinkers, to stretch our collective thinking about a problem or an issue. Email news@civilbeat.org to submit an idea.