A group of neighborhood and environmental organizations is seeking a seat at the table in the latest legal battle over the regulation of short-term vacation rentals on Oahu.

The long-time environmental group on Monday joined the organizations Save Oahu鈥檚 Neighborhoods, HI Good Neighbor, Keep It Kailua and Save North Shore Neighborhoods in filing a motion to intervene in a lawsuit challenging a new Honolulu ordinance meant to rein in rentals of properties in residential neighborhoods.

Honolulu鈥檚 land-use ordinance for decades has generally restricted renting properties to tourists in residential neighborhoods but also allowed rentals of 30 days or longer, regardless of whether the tenant was a tourist or someone else.

A new ordinance adopted this year increased the minimum stay to 90 days. In response, an organization representing property owners filed a federal lawsuit challenging the law, and last week U.S. District Court Judge Derrick Watson issued an order blocking the city from enforcing the 90-day minimum, which was supposed to go into effect next week.

Demonstrators in opposition to Bill 41 hold signs on King Street near Honolulu Hale.
Demonstrators opposed a bill to mandate 90-day minimum stays in residential rental properties when it came before the City Council. Now several neighborhood organizations are fighting to keep the 90-day minimum in the face of a legal challenge filed in federal court by an association of property owners. Cory Lum/Civil Beat/2022

On Thursday, Honolulu Mayor Rick Blangiardi is expected to explain how the city plans to proceed after the court ruling. Options include settling the litigation and grandfathering in properties that previously had rented for at least 30 days, which the plaintiffs’ attorney has estimated to be around 1,000 properties. The city could also appeal Watson鈥檚 interim order blocking the 90-day minimum to the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals or let the lawsuit run its course and decide whether to appeal after a final ruling.

In the meantime, the activist organizations have asked Watson for permission to join the litigation as intervenors. In their request, the organizations say they are primarily homeowners in residential neighborhoods: a class of persons they say the new ordinance is meant to protect 鈥渁nd who will be most directly affected if the Ordinance is not allowed to take effect.鈥

Donna Wong, executive director of Hawaii鈥檚 Thousand Friends, did not return calls for comment on Wednesday. Christine Otto Zaa, co-founder of HI Good Neighbor, also did not return calls. Their attorney, Sharon Lovejoy, declined to comment on the substance of the motion.

The organizations did, however, issue a joint statement on Wednesday outlining their position.

鈥淔or many years, we have fiercely fought to protect our residential-zoned neighborhoods from vacation rentals,鈥 said Larry Bartley of Save Oahu鈥檚 Neighborhoods. 鈥淲e believe these lodging businesses when located in residential zoning reduce residential housing supply, drive-up property values and long-term rental rates; promote tourism sprawl and resident discontent; alter the residential character and ambiance of neighborhoods and communities; compromise neighbors鈥 safety and security; and contradict Oahu鈥檚 General Plan.鈥

The residents also questioned an assertion in Watson鈥檚 order enjoining the city from imposing the 90-day rule — that 30-day rentals were not just for tourists, but also people like traveling nurses, military families in transition, locals who had recently bought or sold a home and folks coming to Oahu for medical care. The resident groups called these 鈥渄ecoys to hide that they are renting their properties as visitor lodging for tourists.鈥

Even renting a month at a time to transients wasn鈥檛 good for the residential integrity of neighborhoods, the groups argued.

鈥淚n our opinion, vacation rentals to transient guests in blocks of 30 days, up to 12 times per year, are equally as harmful to residential-zoned neighborhoods and residential communities as those properties that are rented weekly,鈥 said Chuck Prentiss of Keep it Kailua.

, the group fighting the city that succeeded in getting the ordinance blocked, is run by real estate professionals in the business of renting out vacation properties. Its president, for example, is Andreea Grigore, president of , which offers luxury rentals that seem aimed more at wealthy visitors than ordinary people who need a place to stay for a few weeks.

The president of the Hawaii Legal Short-Term Rental Alliance, Andreea Grigore, lists properties on her company’s site, Elite Pacific Vacations, for sums that total tens of thousands of dollars for 30-day rentals. The quote to rent this property for 30 days in November, for example, was more than $65,000, plus tax. Screenshot/Eiite Pacific Vacations

One of the less expensive properties listed on Oahu, according to a recent search, was a three-bedroom home known as the 鈥渟tarting at鈥 $585 per night. But the quote for a 30-day rental in November was more than $65,000, not including taxes and fees.

Lovejoy said this raised questions about whether the plaintiffs really were serving people like medical and military personnel in need of temporary digs.

“It appears that this plaintiff organization is led by entities聽in the business of vacation rentals at nightly rates that聽far exceed what聽local residents, traveling nurses and military families in transition can pay.”

Grigiore and the alliance鈥檚 attorney, Gregory Kugle, did not return calls for this story.

Support Independent, Unbiased News

Civil Beat is a nonprofit, reader-supported newsroom based in 贬补飞补颈驶颈. When you give, your donation is combined with gifts from thousands of your fellow readers, and together you help power the strongest team of investigative journalists in the state.

 

About the Author