ÌìÃÀÊÓƵ

Spending on political advertising is setting records in the midterm elections. But evidence shows that negative messages might discourage voters from casting ballots altogether.

As the 2022 midterms get closer, political attacks in campaign advertisements are on the rise.

In November, showing him physically attacking Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, a Democrat, and President Joe Biden.

That same month, Rep. Ilhan Omar called her Republican colleague Rep. Lauren Boebert on Twitter. Even the official White House Twitter account has gotten in on the politically divisive action, making when it snapped back in August 2022 at several Republican members of Congress who criticized the – after they themselves had their loans forgiven.

Uncivil messages by politicians have in the last decade. Political attacks are now a regular occurrence in an increasingly polarized political environment, ahead of Election Day in November.

But that doesn’t mean these kinds of advertisements and personal attacks actually work.

and, as a former campaign manager and political consultant, have seen politicians use uncivil strategies firsthand with the hopes of getting themselves elected. on political advertising suggests that highly polarized communications could be losing their persuasive power and can even backfire in the upcoming midterms, hurting a candidate’s chances.

The Impacts Of Political Attack Ads

shows that political ads and language do indeed put people in a negative mood. Even simply asking voters to is enough to get them angry. This negativity is amplified if an ad an opposing candidate.

There is also evidence that this anger carries over to voting behavior. Data from U.S. elections from 2000 to 2012 shows that negative political TV commercials make people less likely to vote for the attacked politician, but also make likely to .

Politicians tend to use on social media compared to their advertising on television, however. This might be because social media attracts a smaller, more targeted audience, and perhaps candidates fear that these kinds of tactics could demobilize supporters.

A record-setting $8.9 billion in political ad spending is expected for this midterm election season.

There are a few factors that help explain why political campaigns and attacks on opponents have become more toxic in recent years.

First off, voters are than ever before. This emotion about politics has been linked to the and – for example, close presidential elections.

Democrats and Republicans in the U.S. are also . This social polarization comes as than ever before. Being a Democrat or a Republican is a core part of who the voter is and shapes both their political decisions – like whom they vote for – as well as their nonpolitical ones, like whom they hang out with.

Given these factors, conversations about politics are increasingly happening among people who already agree on political issues.

Politicians like former President and others seem to be leveraging the fact that they are preaching to the choir, so to speak, and are using to attack the other side.

Whether language is polarized or not is a subjective question, but my research and the work of others has focused on and .

The Declining Power Of Polarized Messaging

There is some evidence that voters may be getting tired of negative political communications flooding their screens.

Using data from the 2016 U.S. presidential election, my collaborators and I found that political ad messages that are more polarized .

Specifically, we find that voters prefer more centrist and more consistent messaging in political ads, at least in the contexts of recent presidential elections. This research used text analysis methods, which allowed us to score each ad for how polarized the messaging was as well as how consistent the messaging was for the candidate.

Polarized messages particularly hurt a candidate’s election chances if they are – that is, for politicians who are typically moderate, and then try to go extreme.

There’s a in the upcoming midterm elections in November 2022, as every House seat and about one-third of the Senate seats are up for grabs. A record-setting in political ad spending is expected for this midterm election season.

If the dominant tone of this messaging is toxic, political campaigns run the risk of disengaging more and more voters.

shows that there are emerging consequences of polarized communications that can hurt candidates in the polls. These insights may encourage political campaigns to test different ad strategies this midterm, perhaps curbing the negativity.

This article is republished from under a Creative Commons license. Read the .