Danny De Gracia: If You're Tired Of Corruption, Vote Smarter
Banning campaign cash during session is not going to stop special interests from trying to influence elected officials.
April 4, 2022 · 5 min read
About the Author
Danny de Gracia is a resident of Waipahu, a political scientist and an ordained minister.
Danny holds a Bachelor of Arts in Political Science and minor in Public Administration from UT San Antonio, 2001; a Master of Arts in聽 Political Science (concentration International Organizations) and minor in Humanities from Texas State University, 2002.
He received his聽Doctor of Theology from Andersonville Theological Seminary in 2013 and Doctor of Ministry in 2014.
Danny received his Ordination from United Fellowship of Christ Ministries International, (Non-Denominational Christian), in 2002.
Danny is also a member of the Waipahu Neighborhood Board, a position he’s held since 2023. His opinions are strictly his own.
In Hawaii, fighting corruption and working to be above reproach in elected office is a lot like New Year鈥檚 resolutions.
Through dereliction of duty, looking the other way, or just not caring, we perennially let problems get so big that they can鈥檛 be ignored, and then we decide to get on a furious ethics-enhancing, corruption-fighting kick that will last at least until the critical news coverage stops.
The best example of this is the Legislature鈥檚 recent attempts to reform campaign financing. Still reeling from the shock waves of the bribery scandal involving the former Sen. Kalani English and Rep. Ty Cullen, one of the bills that is moving quickly through the big square building is聽, which would make it illegal to hold fundraisers while the Legislature is in session.
Superficially speaking, this sounds like a great idea and something that we should have done years ago. After all, even the State Campaign Spending Commission聽聽praised the idea, adding, 鈥淭his amendment will prevent corruption or the appearance of corruption.鈥
Of course, having worked at the Legislature for years, I鈥檓 a little bit too cynical to think that banning fundraisers will suddenly starve malevolent dark forces and dark money from manipulating the minds and votes of elected officials.
For one, a 鈥渇undraiser鈥澛犅燼s any function intended to 鈥渞aise contributions for which the price or suggested contribution for attending the function is more than $25 per person.鈥 Our incumbents didn鈥檛 get into office by being ignorant of semantics.
When I was working for legislators from 2005 to 2010, I can tell you that never once did I ever attend a 鈥渇undraiser鈥 during session. I did, however, attend countless 鈥渂irthday parties鈥 for legislators in which the suggested ticket for attendance was $25 or less, and conveniently the volume of attendees 鈥 many of whom were organized and brought in by special interest groups 鈥 was more than enough to make up for the low ticket price. It鈥檚 shocking, I tell you, how many legislators have birth dates in the months during session!
This is why several testifiers to SB 555 have suggested that the bill be revised to ban the receipt of all contributions entirely during session, because even in the absence of a fundraiser, one can still drop a large donation to a legislator.
But who are we kidding? It鈥檚 absurd to think that the people and organizations that intimately control Honolulu are going to hinge their plans and plots behind chili and rice fundraisers held during session, or on a paltry donation before a key committee or floor vote. That kind of 鈥渇undraising鈥 is how amateurs lavish attention on elected officials of token authority.
The whales of political donations invest early in their candidates and incumbents long before session ever starts, because agenda setting doesn鈥檛 start in the middle of session, it starts before candidates are elected and legislators are given committee assignments to introduce or hear bills.
If you鈥檝e ever seen the 1994 sports movie 鈥淏lue Chips鈥 which shows a fictional university聽聽to recruit basketball talent by bribing athletes with gifts and money, you might be shocked to know that real life political sponsorship of our elected officials is far more elaborate than Hollywood could ever dream.
I have many friends who reflexively say, 鈥溾 as their response to this. I like to pat them on the head gently and give them a macadamia nut and chocolate chip cookie. If only politics and life were that simple. The truth is, you鈥檙e never going to ban your way to an ethical legislature. There are deeper structural and moral problems that stand in the way of us fighting corruption or undue influence in Hawaii.
For one, the House of Representatives is a full-time fundraising job because of the fact that it is a two-year office. The minute that a representative is elected to office, their re-election campaign begins. Whether one is a freshman or a member of House leadership, you鈥檙e never going to get a representative to stop thinking about what they can do to get more money. Why do bees look for flowers? Because that is what bees do, and our representatives are busy bees when it comes to fundraising.
Second, stop with the mandated training seminars, ethics pamphlets, and token restrictions. Those are not meant to stop corruption, they鈥檙e just meant to wave off responsibility for fighting corruption because they give the impression that rules are in place. If you need a law or a PowerPoint presentation about ethics to say don鈥檛 take a check before a key committee vote, you already don鈥檛 possess the requisite discernment to resist being bought off.
With notably few exceptions, we have two types of people in Hawaii office: Well-meaning incompetent people who are easily impressed, and ill-intentioned tyrants who are difficult to defeat. Both groups are all hungry for higher office. The odds are against us if we try to stop lawmakers with laws alone.
Yes, you all hate it when I say this, but in order to get a more ethical elected government, we need a more ethically aware voting population. Don鈥檛 even start either with 鈥渂ut we had terrible choices on the ballot.鈥 No, both the Democrat and Republican parties recruit and filter through the primary election the kinds of choices that reflect the desires of the people who actually matter 鈥 the people who actually vote.
As I have said many times before, if you want better legislators, be a better voter.
Sign up for our FREE morning newsletter and face each day more informed.
Read this next:
Eric Stinton: Kids Are Struggling To Cope. We Need To Help Them
By Eric Stinton · April 5, 2022 · 7 min read
Local reporting when you need it most
Support timely, accurate, independent journalism.
天美视频 is a nonprofit organization, and your donation helps us produce local reporting that serves all of Hawaii.
ContributeAbout the Author
Danny de Gracia is a resident of Waipahu, a political scientist and an ordained minister.
Danny holds a Bachelor of Arts in Political Science and minor in Public Administration from UT San Antonio, 2001; a Master of Arts in聽 Political Science (concentration International Organizations) and minor in Humanities from Texas State University, 2002.
He received his聽Doctor of Theology from Andersonville Theological Seminary in 2013 and Doctor of Ministry in 2014.
Danny received his Ordination from United Fellowship of Christ Ministries International, (Non-Denominational Christian), in 2002.
Danny is also a member of the Waipahu Neighborhood Board, a position he’s held since 2023. His opinions are strictly his own.
Latest Comments (0)
To be better voters, we need better coverage and an engaged population. The main paper provides little coverage and the general population is probably bored with politics, hence the poor turnouts. Really little coverage of what really goes on.I agree we need better voters. We also need honest candidates who are not afraid to say what needs to be done, with real debates and not just continuous commercials..
buds4fun · 2 years ago
Danny, Danny, Danny, you did a superb job describing the problem, and the hypocrisy of thinking we can be saved by a commission report or ethics seminars, or fundraising schedules. These have been my thoughts also but you expressed my opinion better than even I could, thanks.But your solution is extremely weak, and is contradicted by all your previous brilliant points.Really, you blame the voters? "be a better voter" That's all you can say, while patronizingly dismissing, with a pat on our head, public financing of campaigns. And you really believe the party candidates reflect desires of actual voters?As you point out, it's all about the money, big bucks wins elections nearly every time. In that case, public financing, which does happen elsewhere, could be very helpful. And how about term limits? Our situation is so desperate (e.g. highest taxes, lowest real income, highest cost of living, narrowest economy, no urban plan, traffic, sea levels, etc) we need many more electoral reforms.To produce better voters, we also need better reporting by our main newspaper, whose efforts to reveal the dark underbelly of local politics has been underwhelming.
denniscallan · 2 years ago
The courts have told us time and time again that political contributions are a form of free speech. In other words, we are told that corruption is an integral feature of representative democracy (republic) - a "price of democracy," if you will. We are lucky to be rich enough to afford it, aren't we?
Chiquita · 2 years ago
About IDEAS
IDEAS is the place you'll find essays, analysis and opinion on public affairs in Hawaii. We want to showcase smart ideas about the future of Hawaii, from the state's sharpest thinkers, to stretch our collective thinking about a problem or an issue. Email news@civilbeat.org to submit an idea.