Ƶ

Cory Lum/Civil Beat/2017

About the Author

Brian Barbata

Brian Barbata, a Hawaii resident since 1976, received his B.A. from Brown University and an MBA from Harvard Business School. His extensive background includes serving as an officer in the U.S. Navy’s Underwater Demolition and SEAL Team, as a marketing executive, as an accounting consultant and as a founding director of the Kauai Island Utility Cooperative. Barbata wrote this article on behalf of the Practical Policy Institute of Hawaii, a new 501(c)(3) nonprofit whose purpose is to educate policy makers and the people of Hawaii about the state's climate change policies and options.

Civil Beat recently published an article by Noel Morin of the Citizens’ Climate Lobby, which advocates for a carbon tax, something that has been considered by the Hawaii Legislature for at least two years.

Opinion article badge

So what is a carbon tax, and what is its purpose?

The theory is that a tax on the production or consumption of goods that produce carbon dioxide, a greenhouse gas, will incentivize producers and consumers to stop doing that to save money. It is inherently an assumption about consumer behavior, or as marketers like to call it, “price sensitivity.”

There is no magic cost increase that will produce the behavior a carbon tax seeks. In the case of Hawaii’s bills, the presumed “cost” of a ton of CO2 produced was $20. Climate advocates determined that $20 was “not enough” and got it changed to $80 a ton.

The basis for this fourfold increase was their belief that $20 a ton, boiled down to the price of gasoline and jet fuel, was not punitive enough to force you and me to change our destructive ways.

Today’s bill, , contains a list of every type of fossil fuel, but still adds “Other.” Here is the first year (next year), and what the taxes will increase to by 2035:

table for a Comm Voices March 2022

The 2035 tax on gasoline of $33.16 per barrel is $.79 per gallon (42 gallons in a petroleum barrel). How do they know that will get your attention, let alone in the earlier years? They don’t.

Hawaii has had many tests of our price sensitivity on gasoline. Each time prices went out of sight, consumption declined briefly, and then came right back to about where it was before. A good example was in July 2008, when Regular gasoline jumped from $3.48 to $4.47 in six months (Source: DBEDT).

During that period, and continuing to this day, the consumption of gasoline has basically remained flat.

Today, the average price of regular in Hawaii is about $5 (Source: AAA), and consumption is fairly close the average for the last 15 years (Source: DBEDT/EIA).

Old Habits

What does this tell us about the ability of a carbon tax to chase us out of our gasoline cars and into electric vehicles by increasing gas prices? It tells us that we value our driving experience so much, we will give up other things to keep doing it as we always have. Old habits are hard to break.

Another look at the tax amounts reveals something equally nonsensical. Apparently, those producing them think that it takes different amounts of tax to produce the desired rejection of the product.

So, a $4.68 tax on jet fuel will make you want to fly less, but it will take $5.27 to make you drive less or buy an electric car. Similarly, each tax increases by different amounts over the next 13 years.

Is something expected to happen to our price sensitivity as the years go by?

gas price sign Honolulu March 15, 2022
A sign displaying gas prices in Honolulu on Tuesday. Chad Blair/Civil Beat/2022

Of course, the expectation that a carbon tax passed through to Hawaii consumers will drive us all to adopt electric vehicles is not based on any real data or science. It is based on a desire of well-meaning climate activists to punish you for using your gasoline car, economically forcing you to change your ways.

But wait! The bill eases the pain. You’re going to get some of that money back as a Hawaii resident!

First of all, does that make any sense to you? The state is going to tax your gasoline, and then give the money back? HB 2278 includes a rebate scheme, giving rise to the title of Mr. Morin’s comments: “Carbon Cashback.”

Write your legislator and ask them to oppose the carbon tax.

Of course, it’s complicated. But the gist of it is that, by 2035, Hawaii taxpayers will get a carbon tax credit between $240 and $960.

Whether you already drive an electric vehicle, don’t drive at all, or drive your gas guzzler, you likely will qualify. No matter if you drive 10 miles or 10,000 miles a year, you can claim this credit, which you file with your state tax return to reduce your taxes. It’s not based on miles, it’s based on your tax category.

Does this smell? It should.

This tax would begin first thing next year, and go on forever. It’s a multi-billion dollar annual revenue windfall for the state, because the money not handed out as tax credits will go into a series of funds, including the state general fund.

The state has over a million cars on the road. Currently, only 17,000 of them are electric, after over 20 years of their availability.

The state wants to be 100% renewable by 2045, even though it’s not clear how it will get there, with renewables, thousands of chargers, and rebuilding the grid. But it wants you to buy an electric car to help it get there. In 2035, if you drive 10,000 miles and average 25 mpg, keeping your gasoline powered car is going to cost you an additional $316 a year because of the carbon tax. You will then qualify for a tax rebate of between $240 and $960.

Huh? What the heck is going on here?

Write your legislator and ask them to oppose the carbon tax.

Community Voices aims to encourage broad discussion on many topics of community interest. It’s kind of a cross between Letters to the Editor and op-eds. This is your space to talk about important issues or interesting people who are making a difference in our world. Column lengths should be no more than 800 words and we need a photo of the author and a bio. We welcome video commentary and other multimedia formats. Send to news@civilbeat.org. The opinions and information expressed in Community Voices are solely those of the authors and not Civil Beat.


Read this next:

John Pritchett: Blowing Smoke?


Local reporting when you need it most

Support timely, accurate, independent journalism.

Ƶ is a nonprofit organization, and your donation helps us produce local reporting that serves all of Hawaii.

Contribute

About the Author

Brian Barbata

Brian Barbata, a Hawaii resident since 1976, received his B.A. from Brown University and an MBA from Harvard Business School. His extensive background includes serving as an officer in the U.S. Navy’s Underwater Demolition and SEAL Team, as a marketing executive, as an accounting consultant and as a founding director of the Kauai Island Utility Cooperative. Barbata wrote this article on behalf of the Practical Policy Institute of Hawaii, a new 501(c)(3) nonprofit whose purpose is to educate policy makers and the people of Hawaii about the state's climate change policies and options.


Latest Comments (0)

To answer this article’s skepticism about market-based solutions and carbon pricing, there is broad agreement among economists that carbon pricing reduces emissions. Models predict it, and real-world examples back it up. By September 2021, 27 countries had implemented a carbon tax. In 2001, the UK imposed a carbon tax on fuels used by manufacturers of £16 - £30/ton/CO2. Manufacturing cut electricity use by 23%. A 2018 Imperial College found the UK’s carbon tax promoted the UK's rapid renewables deployment, fastest coal phase-out, and highest electric vehicles uptake.In 2008, British Columbia introduced a broad carbon tax of C$10/ton/CO2, rising to C$30 in 2012, increasing to C$35 in 2018. Petroleum and natural gas demand fell significantly. 2008 - 2013, per capita CO2 use declined 15%, with no reduction in B.C.’s economy.In 1991, Sweden levied a carbon tax, of €29/ton/CO2 - €137/ton/CO2. The tax covered less than 2/3's of Sweden's CO2 use. In 2016, Sweden’s GDP growth was 60%, and emissions reduced 25%. Sweden emits 1/4 as much CO2 per GDP dollar as the U.S.. Sweden's GHG emissions are 1/3 lower than the EU average.

SustainableForest22 · 2 years ago

I think this article was misleading! The reason this bill is being considered is because the policy is based on the UHERO studies. The studies found that the average household in every quintile benefits financially! So yes you can use a gas guzzling car or drive an EV and you'll both get the same amount back. Thus, the EV driver who didn't hurt families in Hawaiʻi or the environment by polluting actually spent less and is at a higher net gain!!The policy works by making renewable energy cost-competitive and doing so in a way that is good for people!I support House Bill 2278!

saralinnea · 2 years ago

Today 3 out of 4 new car sales in Norway are EVs (Norway has built EV chargers all over the country plus there are hefty taxes on gas cars, gas car registration, and tax incentives for EVs). Ironically, Norway produces 2 million barrels of oil daily – and a gallon of gasoline costs over $8 (Norway could have subsidized gasoline, like Venezuela’s regime made citizens happy with 50-cents a gallon gas, but that is, as we know, not sustainable!). Norway is barely five Hawaiis’ in population, too. A carbon tax alone won’t move the needle – it is a comprehensive "carrot" and "stick" approach. Also, Hawaii's "souped-up" Big Gas Car culture (mindset) has to change. This diversion of limited family funds for huge gas-guzzling trucks and SUVs is a big factor in Hawaii's lack of economic equity. Families must invest funds away from Big Cars to digital literacy, mathematics, business English, and entrepreneurship/finance – for high-paying jobs (Kala Nui!) and the ability to pay for big houses and a EV charging station – and as we say – "malama the environment" .

FHSGrad · 2 years ago

Join the conversation

About IDEAS

IDEAS is the place you'll find essays, analysis and opinion on public affairs in Hawaii. We want to showcase smart ideas about the future of Hawaii, from the state's sharpest thinkers, to stretch our collective thinking about a problem or an issue. Email news@civilbeat.org to submit an idea.

Mahalo!

You're officially signed up for our daily newsletter, the Morning Beat. A confirmation email will arrive shortly.

In the meantime, we have other newsletters that you might enjoy. Check the boxes for emails you'd like to receive.

  • What's this? Be the first to hear about important news stories with these occasional emails.
  • What's this? You'll hear from us whenever Civil Beat publishes a major project or investigation.
  • What's this? Get our latest environmental news on a monthly basis, including updates on Nathan Eagle's 'Hawaii 2040' series.
  • What's this? Get occasional emails highlighting essays, analysis and opinion from IDEAS, Civil Beat's commentary section.

Inbox overcrowded? Don't worry, you can unsubscribe
or update your preferences at any time.