ÌìÃÀÊÓƵ

Cory Lum/Civil Beat/2021

About the Author

Paul Migliorato

Paul Migliorato is vice president of membership and marketing of the Hawaii Economic Association.


In 1993 Hawaii welcomed 6,070,995 visitors. Among them were me, my spouse, and our daughter, then 5 months old. We also contributed to another statistic — the 2,212,129 visitors who arrived in Maui that year.

Our first trip to Hawaii acted like a gateway drug. We were enchanted. But we were also practical. On subsequent trips we visited other islands, slowly exploring the idea of relocating from Tokyo.

We eventually did so a decade later, by then a family of four, lured by the opportunity to raise our children in a welcoming and multicultural environment. We bought a house on Oahu from a couple needing to downsize after having raised two daughters who had left the state to pursue their own careers.

Hawaii became our home.

While much has changed since 1993, Hawaii’s appeal as a destination and place to live has not. When our daughters moved on, we downsized as well. The Makiki condo tower where we now live is mostly occupied by owners, with some of the units occupied by long-term renters, many of whom have also downsized.

I include this detail about where we live, surrounded by other families also content to approach or enjoy retirement, because at first glance we are largely untouched by an industry that so dominates discussion today — tourism.

The reality is that Hawaii remains hugely affected by and reliant on tourism. In one way or another, we all are.

Like New Year’s resolutions, plans to diversify the economy beyond tourism seem to get mentioned annually and have similarly fleeting impact. A first step in reducing that reliance, if it is possible, is to better understand tourism’s components and impacts.

Repeat Visitors

Because economists are still struggling to gauge the effects of the coronavirus pandemic, this analysis employs 2019 visitor data as a benchmark. The fact that 2019 saw Hawaii visitor numbers exceed 10 million for the first time is significant, but so is another reality: over 68% of visitors to Hawaii were repeat visitors. The figure for repeat domestic visitors approached 72%.

This ability to attract repeat visitors is hardly new — it certainly describes my family’s experience before we finally moved here.

Waikiki Beach as tourism and visitor industry recovers during the COVID19 pandemic.
Waikiki Beach is again a major visitor destination, in spite of Covid. Cory Lum/Civil Beat/2021

In 2019, visitors spent $17.8 billion in Hawaii, a remarkable figure and one which excludes the costs of getting here. It also doesn’t include the money invested in the businesses that support tourism.

Reducing visitor numbers isn’t a recipe for increasing visitor spending; complicating the construction of new visitor capacity or renovations isn’t either. Limiting hotel construction and renovation, as Maui County has proposed, misses an important point: statewide, only 42.8% of 2019 visitor spending was on lodging. Food and beverage spending accounted for 20.8% of the total, shopping 13.3%, transportation 9.7%, and entertainment and recreation 9.1%.

As Covid has already shown, reduced visitor numbers and spending will ricochet throughout the service economy, reducing both jobs and revenue longer term.

Industry Infrastructure

A less obvious part of our reliance on tourism involves property taxes. Because each county uses different property designations and tax rates, calculations of reliance levels differ. Properties which cater to visitors account for an outsized share of property tax revenues statewide, but it is most extreme in the two counties which rely most on visitor traffic.

Hotel and resorts, time share properties, and short-term rental units together account for 40.4% of Kauai property tax revenue, based on the most current valuations. For Maui the level is 54.6%.

A less obvious part of our reliance on tourism involves property taxes.

Put differently, visitor industry infrastructure is doing much to fund county activities.

One other metric makes the visitor industry’s impact frighteningly clear: dividing visitor spending in each county by resident population. In 2019, spending in Kauai came to $26,406 per resident. For Maui, the level was $31,616. The numbers for Oahu and the Big Island are less striking, but they are significant, and no county faces a situation where increased spending by residents will offset a significant reduction in visitor spending.

The tourism industry affects us all. It had a role in many of us coming here. Less obviously, it supports the state’s finances.

While we often point to jobs created, its impact extends much further. We’re lucky to live Hawaii, but lucky to be living in a place that attracts visitors as well.

Community Voices aims to encourage broad discussion on many topics of community interest. It’s kind of a cross between Letters to the Editor and op-eds. This is your space to talk about important issues or interesting people who are making a difference in our world. Column lengths should be no more than 800 words and we need a photo of the author and a bio. We welcome video commentary and other multimedia formats. Send to news@civilbeat.org. The opinions and information expressed in Community Voices are solely those of the authors and not Civil Beat.


Read this next:

Denby Fawcett: The Pope Says Getting Vaccinated Is An 'Act of Love.' He's Right


Local reporting when you need it most

Support timely, accurate, independent journalism.

ÌìÃÀÊÓƵ is a nonprofit organization, and your donation helps us produce local reporting that serves all of Hawaii.

Contribute

About the Author

Paul Migliorato

Paul Migliorato is vice president of membership and marketing of the Hawaii Economic Association.


Latest Comments (0)

Much of that visitor industry spending goes to out of state owned resorts and some to car rental companies.  A much smaller amount goes to local earnings like shops and restaurants.

Valerie · 3 years ago

We need to stop pretending there is some magic way to "diversify" Hawaii's economy so as to eliminate its dependence on the hospitality industry.  There isn't. No other industry or aggregation of industries can offer the jobs, revenue and family wealth. It's fine to explore and grow new businesses and we should encourage that. But from an economic perspective, Hawaii lives, or dies, depending on its tourism.

CatManapua · 3 years ago

In the past there was no organization to regulate tourism.  The HTA mission was to promote tourism.  That needs to change.  We need to regulate tourism in some fashion.  Maybe we need a body made up of residents to regulate tourism.  Better yet modify the mission of HTA to regulate tourism and appoint people who are residence to serve on the board.

Richard_Bidleman · 3 years ago

Join the conversation

About IDEAS

IDEAS is the place you'll find essays, analysis and opinion on public affairs in Hawaii. We want to showcase smart ideas about the future of Hawaii, from the state's sharpest thinkers, to stretch our collective thinking about a problem or an issue. Email news@civilbeat.org to submit an idea.

Mahalo!

You're officially signed up for our daily newsletter, the Morning Beat. A confirmation email will arrive shortly.

In the meantime, we have other newsletters that you might enjoy. Check the boxes for emails you'd like to receive.

  • What's this? Be the first to hear about important news stories with these occasional emails.
  • What's this? You'll hear from us whenever Civil Beat publishes a major project or investigation.
  • What's this? Get our latest environmental news on a monthly basis, including updates on Nathan Eagle's 'Hawaii 2040' series.
  • What's this? Get occasional emails highlighting essays, analysis and opinion from IDEAS, Civil Beat's commentary section.

Inbox overcrowded? Don't worry, you can unsubscribe
or update your preferences at any time.