The process of redrawing Hawaii鈥檚 political boundaries could extend into next year because of a delay in getting population data from the U.S. Census Bureau.

The Hawaii Reapportionment Commission on Monday got to work setting out a timeline that allows it to complete reapportionment and redistricting in a reasonable timeframe given the delays in federal data.

The commission also divided work among its members, despite objections that much of the commission鈥檚 work will take place behind closed doors.

The Hawaii Reapportionment Commission, a nine-member panel that meets once each decade to redraw Hawaii鈥檚 political maps, likely will not finish its work until the end of February. By law, the commission must have new political boundaries drawn for legislative districts by mid-September.

Hawaii Reapportionment Commission Chairman Mark Mugiishi presided over his first commission meeting Monday. The state panel set out a timeline for redistricting and divided work among its members. Screenshot/2021

But the federal government is not expected to have reapportionment data to states until mid-August. So the commission voted unanimously on Monday to ask the state Attorney General鈥檚 Office to petition the Hawaii Supreme Court to extend the deadline.

The commissioners plans to ask the court to allow it to have a draft reapportionment plan publicly available by Jan. 8 with a final plan completed no later than Feb. 27.

Those preliminary deadlines would run right into the state鈥檚 candidate filing period. In normal election years, nomination papers are available starting in February.

But state lawmakers have already pushed that back to March 1 in anticipation of redistricting taking longer than usual.

The Senate has also asked the AG鈥檚 office to petition the court to extend the commission鈥檚 deadlines.

Most Discussion Will Happen Behind Closed Doors

Most of the commission鈥檚 discussions regarding its new timeline and hiring staff took place behind closed doors, not in the public session, on Monday. However, the commissioners reconvened in public to announce their decisions.

Sandy Ma, executive director of Common Cause Hawaii, said the open-government organization objects to the commission鈥檚 use of closed sessions to discuss topics like the impact of census data on the commission鈥檚 timeline.

鈥淭his information is especially critical for the public watching and attending these meetings,鈥 Ma said.

Mark Mugiishi, the chairman of the commission and CEO of the Hawaii Medical Services Association, said those items had to be taken up during a closed session because they involved personnel and a discussion with the commission鈥檚 lawyers regarding the federal data.

The commissioners also divided themselves into two four-member committees to come up with rules for the commission to follow and take part in drawing new political boundaries.

Members of the technical committee are Dylan Nonaka, Charlotte Nekota, Diane Ono and Kevin Rathbun.

The rules committee members are Cal Chipchase, Robin Kennedy, Grant Chun and Randall Nishimura.

Two individuals at Monday’s meeting voiced concerns that the public won’t be able to adequately participate in deliberations involving reapportionment. Screenshot

The committees don鈥檛 need to follow the state鈥檚 open meetings law because they were organized as Permitted Interaction Groups, according to Chief Elections Officer Scott Nago.

That means they are allowed to conduct much of their business out of the public eye. However, the committees鈥 proposals must still win approval by the other commissioners.

And proposed reapportionment plans must also be approved by the full commission.

Prior to the panel鈥檚 decisions on its committees, Ma asked that the public be allowed to participate in the committees鈥 discussions and that the committees 鈥渘ot be used as a shield to prevent public participation in the reapportionment process.鈥

Bart Dame, a national committeeman with the Hawaii Democratic Party, also objected to the use of these closed committees to conduct business. He said that the committees in 2011 also met privately and didn鈥檛 always do a good job of summarizing for the public the full extent of their discussions.

鈥淭he secrecy last time contributed to the commission going off-track,鈥 Dame said, referencing delays in the last reapportionment process.

Mugiishi said that his goal is to be as 鈥渢ransparent as is feasible.鈥

The rules committee may elect to use the same rules as the prior commission when it comes to how the commission conducts its business and meetings.

The technical committee would bear the brunt of the commission鈥檚 work in drawing political lines. The technical committee would also set parameters for how districts are drawn 鈥 for example, if there should be canoe districts that include parts of more than one island 鈥 or if multiple lawmakers should be able to represent a single district.

Nonaka, who served on that committee in 2011, said that members of the technical committee would need to make a significant time commitment to redraw the political lines. He told the commissioners to expect weekly meetings lasting several hours each time.

鈥淚t鈥檚 an arduous process to go thorough 鈥 each district by district, island by island 鈥 to draw the lines,鈥 he said.

All 76-seats in the Legislature will be up for election in 2022.

Islands may gain or lose seats depending on where the population grew in the state. In 2011, Oahu lost a Senate seat while the Big Island gained one.

Hawaii鈥檚 population grew about 7%, just slightly lower than the national average, since the 2010 census. Hawaii鈥檚 population was just over 1.4 million as of 2020.聽

Support Independent, Unbiased News

Civil Beat is a nonprofit, reader-supported newsroom based in 贬补飞补颈驶颈. When you give, your donation is combined with gifts from thousands of your fellow readers, and together you help power the strongest team of investigative journalists in the state.

 

About the Author