Hawaii residents will soon be receiving checks in the mail as part of the $2 trillion Coronavirus Aid, Relief and Economic Security Act .

While popularly characterized as 鈥渟timulus checks,鈥 the money being sent out as an offset against the outbreak of COVID-19 is not free money but, , an advance 鈥渞ecovery rebate鈥 of up to 鈥$1,200 ($2,400 in the case of eligible individuals filing a joint return), plus 鈥 an amount equal to the product of $500 multiplied by the number of qualifying children 鈥 of the taxpayer.鈥

础濒迟丑辞耻驳丑听聽are still being worked out, the Tax Foundation鈥檚聽聽explains 鈥渢he rebate is a credit against tax liability and is refundable for taxpayers with no tax liability to offset.鈥

The rebates, as聽聽by the Tax Foundation, begin to phase out by $50 for every $1,000 earned over the cap of $75,000 for singles and $150,000 for joint taxpayers with no children.

In sum, the CARES Act鈥檚 provisions that would stabilize the economy by sending checks directly to hard-hit families is really not a gift from Uncle Sam, but rather, an opportunity to keep more of one鈥檚 money already earned. Courtesy of Congress, the American people are basically taking a monetary blood transfusion from their left arm and injecting it into their right arm.

Understandably, members of Congress like Democratic presidential candidate and Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders聽 over how the CARES Act does not do enough to help low-income workers, while billions of dollars will be injected into saving large corporations.

One doesn鈥檛 have to be a progressive or democratic socialist to see the inequality at work in the coronavirus relief; taxpayers will be paying for both their 鈥渟timulus鈥 checks and the bailouts of corporate America. As it is, earlier in the month, the Federal Reserve 聽to prevent a聽.

As if to add insult to injury, Hawaii鈥檚 high cost of living undermines the checks locals will be receiving as coronavirus assistance. In the mainland, an individual who made $75,000 in the previous tax years would probably be considered well-off, and receiving a rebate of $1,200 might be helpful, but not essential to their survival.

But when the local cost of living for Hawaii is calculated, that same individual is essentially living on the fringes of poverty. For context, 聽is already considered 鈥渓ow income.鈥

Though both Congress and President Trump clearly wanted to pass some kind of major legislation to boost consumer optimism and save tanking markets, the CARES Act鈥檚 attempts to help taxpayers with direct payments is at best superficial. For one, Hawaii legislators, along with other coastal representatives, should have pushed for the CARES Act to give more money to people living in locations with higher costs of living.

In Honolulu, there鈥檚 really not much you can do with $1,200 in self-quarantine. That might cover an extra rent payment, possibly allow for extra groceries, or even allow you to shave a little off your maxed-out credit card bills, but for someone who has been laid off as a result of coronavirus, $1,200 in Hawaii is manini.

This brings us to the real problem with the CARES Act. If you lost your job because of COVID-19, your income is zero, so why should it even matter how much money you made in previous tax years? Shouldn鈥檛 people just get a no-strings-attached cash injection from the government because this crisis is going to hurt everyone?

There has been discussion聽聽should the coronavirus pandemic worsen.聽On Sunday,聽聽additional rounds of checks were seen as “very plausible.”聽If聽this happens, our Hawaii delegation needs to champion the case for getting more money in the hands of local families. Here’s why.

In places like Hawaii, residents are being told to stay home at no fault of their own under force of law because of a virus threatening public safety. If the government tells you to stay home, it is the government鈥檚 responsibility to provide and take care of you while you are obeying their orders.

Besides, we still don鈥檛 know if Hawaii residents who get infected with and survive COVID-19 will have additional large medical expenses related to their rehabilitation. They are going to need help, over and above the subsidies Congress is giving to healthcare organizations.

Our Hawaii delegation needs to champion the case for getting more money in the hands of local families.

Second, the inflation that will be created by our bailout of Wall Street to save the stock market will ultimately end up manifesting in consumer prices down the road. Hawaii,聽which is especially sensitive to market tantrums, will suffer the most.

This crisis is no fault of the public, and they should receive some kind of compensation for both聽聽against COVID-19 and the effects of inflation from the government鈥檚 assistance to Wall Street.

Let鈥檚 make this really work. There was a time when our leaders聽聽that 鈥渢he United States of America will neither forget nor forsake you, and that it will win the ultimate victory.鈥

I still choose to believe that this country should not forsake its sick or vulnerable. And I still choose to believe that with the right policies, we will win the ultimate victory over COVID-19.

Support Independent, Unbiased News

Civil Beat is a nonprofit, reader-supported newsroom based in 贬补飞补颈驶颈. When you give, your donation is combined with gifts from thousands of your fellow readers, and together you help power the strongest team of investigative journalists in the state.

 

About the Author

  • Danny de Gracia

    Danny de Gracia is a resident of Waipahu, a political scientist and an ordained minister.

    Danny holds a Bachelor of Arts in Political Science and minor in Public Administration from UT San Antonio, 2001; a Master of Arts in聽 Political Science (concentration International Organizations) and minor in Humanities from Texas State University, 2002.

    He received his聽Doctor of Theology from Andersonville Theological Seminary in 2013 and Doctor of Ministry in 2014.

    Danny received his Ordination from United Fellowship of Christ Ministries International, (Non-Denominational Christian), in 2002.

    Danny is also a member of the Waipahu Neighborhood Board, a position he’s held since 2023. His opinions are strictly his own.