Why Are Hawaii’s Lawmakers So Scared Of Hemp?
As other states establish flourishing industrial hemp programs, we continue to lag far behind.
It has now been over a year since the federal government freed hemp from the Schedule I Drug designation through the 2018 Farm Bill.
States like Kentucky, Colorado, Oregon, Montana and North Dakota have all widely expanded their industrial hemp programs, implemented manufacturing/production procedures, and have truly taken advantage of all that this lucrative agricultural product has to offer.
So why hasn鈥檛 Hawaii?
Because hemp hysteria runs rampant at the Capitol.
Hawaii鈥檚 unique climate allows for three different hemp crop seasons, more than any other place in the country. Hemp would be an excellent replacement on agricultural lands formerly used for sugarcane and would bioremediate the soil. There has been no shortage of interest in both cultivation/production sectors and consumer markets, as hemp has been shown to be a profitable, environmentally beneficial, incredibly versatile plant.
Hemp contains less than 0.3% tetrahydrocannabinol, the psychoactive component of cannabis, making it virtually impossible for anyone to get 鈥渉igh鈥 off it. Your average medical strain of cannabis contains somewhere between 15-25% THC in comparison.
With all these economic and environmental benefits for Hawaii, it is confounding that there are bills like trying to restrict the sale and production of hemp products, most egregiously for people under the age of 21.
The bill, though seemingly defaulting to the FDA, does not actually recognize its policies regarding hemp. It completely ignores that there are already three 鈥済enerally recognized as safe鈥 notices for the hemp seed-derived food ingredients, hulled hemp seed, hemp seed protein powder, and hemp seed oil, which the FDA has made legal to market in human foods.
It also fails to recognize that under the 2018 Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, cosmetic products and ingredients are not subject to premarket approval by the FDA, except for most color additives. Certain cosmetic ingredients are prohibited or restricted by regulation, but currently that is not the case for any cannabis or cannabis-derived ingredients.
In addition, the bill also seems to contradict itself in that it states a cosmetic shall not be considered adulterated or misbranded solely by the inclusion of hemp or cannabinoids, but then it prohibits the sale of hemp products to anyone under the age of 21.
Products that have been on shelves in retailers like Costco, TJ Maxx, Whole Foods, etc. ranging from lotion and shampoo to cereal and protein shakes, would require an ID to purchase. Hemp is not a drug, but it is being treated as such in HB 2102 HD1.
It鈥檚 both hopeful and frustrating to watch so many other states in the country establish flourishing industrial hemp programs, while Hawaii, a place nearly perfect for this crop, remains stagnant.
The Legislature needs to reject hemp hysteria, which hurts our farmers and consumers who want and benefit from using these products.
HB 2102 HD1 in the House Finance committee on Wednesday, Feb. 19, at 4 p.m. in House Conference Room 308.
Sign up for our FREE morning newsletter and face each day more informed.
Community Voices aims to encourage broad discussion on many topics of community interest. It鈥檚 kind of a cross between Letters to the Editor and op-eds. This is your space to talk about important issues or interesting people who are making a difference in our world. Column lengths should be no more than 800 words and we need a current photo of the author and a bio. We welcome video commentary and other multimedia formats. Send to news@civilbeat.org.聽The opinions and information expressed in Community Voices are solely those of the authors and not Civil Beat.
