Those of us who are getting along in years may remember the 鈥済eneral income tax credit,鈥 a line on our state income tax return where we could claim a $1 credit.

The saga of this credit tells us a little about a bold move undertaken in the 1978 Constitutional Convention and our lawmakers鈥 reaction, which was to beat it into insignificance within a couple of years.

The last time we had a constitutional convention, in 1978, delegates thought that government shouldn鈥檛 be keeping the people鈥檚 money if it didn鈥檛 have to.

Where budget surpluses go to die: The Hawaii House of Representatives. Stewart Yerton/Civil Beat

鈥淵our Committee believes that it is proper for the State’s taxpayers to benefit from any surplus in the State’s general fund balance,鈥 they said in Committee of the Whole Report No. 14.

So, they put before the voters, and the voters approved, what became Article VII, section 6 of our Constitution.聽It says that if our general fund balance is more than 5 percent of general fund revenues for two fiscal years in a row, then the Legislature is supposed to enact a tax credit or refund to give some of that money back to us taxpayers.

This credit came to be called the general income tax credit.

In the first year the provision was effective, 1981, the surplus requirements were met, and lawmakers gave the taxpayers a credit of $100 per head.

In 1982, the surplus requirement was met again, but lawmakers thought that $100 was a little much. So, they knocked it down to $25.

In 1983, the surplus requirement was met again, and lawmakers apparently decided that this dumb credit was getting in the way of good budgeting. They slashed it to $1.

For the next five years in a row, the surplus requirement was met again, and lawmakers gave the taxpayers a credit of $1 in each of those years.

In 1989, with Hawaii鈥檚 economy apparently on a roll, lawmakers generously approved a $125 general income tax credit! It didn鈥檛 take long for cooler heads to prevail, however. The credit was cut to $60 the following year, and in 1991 鈥 yes, you guessed it 鈥 we were back to $1, where we stayed through 1995.

So Long, Tax Credit

In 1996, the surplus requirement was not met. No credit was required, and none was given. This continued through 2000.

In 2001, we once again met the surplus requirement. Once again lawmakers gave us a $1 credit. The same happened in 2002.

For the years 2003-2006, the surplus requirement wasn鈥檛 met.

In 2007, state coffers were in great shape and the general income tax credit again sprung to life. This time lawmakers tiered it so more would be given to poorer people.聽It ranged from zero to $160.

In 2008 and 2009, the economy sunk but the surplus requirement was met.聽Two more years of a $1 credit resulted.

In 2010, the Legislature proposed, and voters approved, a constitutional amendment that allowed lawmakers to forgo providing a tax credit if they instead shoved some money into our rainy-day fund.聽Thus 2009 was the last year of the general income tax credit.

With that history, do you think the intent of the constitutional convention delegates was met? Or do you think lawmakers acted like slippery eels and dodged the provision?

If voters think it鈥檚 a good idea to tell lawmakers to curb the growth of government, maybe they should consider a constitutional convention where limitations like this one can be considered.

Thoughts on this or any other story? Write a Letter to the Editor. Send to news@civilbeat.org and put Letter in the subject line. 200 words max. You need to use your name and city and include a contact phone for verification purposes.

You can also comment directly on this story by scrolling down a little further. Comments are subject to approval and we may not publish every one.

Community Voices aims to encourage broad discussion on many topics of community interest. It鈥檚 kind of a cross between Letters to the Editor and op-eds. This is your space to talk about important issues or interesting people who are making a difference in our world. Column lengths should be no more than 800 words and we need a current photo of the author and a bio. We welcome video commentary and other multimedia formats. Send to news@civilbeat.org.聽The opinions and information expressed in Community Voices are solely those of the authors and not Civil Beat.

Support Independent, Unbiased News

Civil Beat is a nonprofit, reader-supported newsroom based in 贬补飞补颈驶颈. When you give, your donation is combined with gifts from thousands of your fellow readers, and together you help power the strongest team of investigative journalists in the state.

 

About the Author