When Tommy Waters called me after the primary election and asked me to support him in the general election for Honolulu City Council District 4, I was hesitant. However, since then I have spent many hours with him and have realized we share similar important values. These values form the foundation of my support for Tommy.
One of the first things I noticed about Tommy is he treats people with aloha. During our canvassing and at public meetings, I observed how he is respectful of others and open to discussion with people, even if they have differing opinions. The aloha spirit, which is defined in the Hawaii Revised Statutes Sec. 5-7.5, seems to be second nature to him.
Tommy has also pledged to follow the city鈥檚 , which states in part that 鈥渢he public interest is (elected officials鈥) primary concern.鈥 It includes policies on conflicts of interest, fair and equal treatment and the Honolulu Ethics Commission.
In addition, Tommy supports open government and transparency. 鈥淭ransparency鈥 is a word that is often thrown about in discussions at City Council, but it has been trampled upon by violations of the Sunshine Law. Tommy has pledged to work hard to 鈥渂ring honesty, dedication and transparency back to the City Council,鈥 and I will hold him to that promise.
We don鈥檛 agree on some issues, but starting with these core values is extremely important and the main reason I support Tommy.
I think it鈥檚 important for people to also understand why I do not support Trevor Ozawa. I鈥檝e paid close attention to his words and actions since he was elected to office. In my opinion, based on his record and my experience with him, he is not transparent, not fiscally prudent, and not respectful of others.
On transparency: Ozawa added a one-sentence 鈥減roviso鈥 to the back of Bill 22, CD2, FD1, HART鈥檚 capital budget, to authorize the use of city funds to pay for rail. was only discussed at third and final reading of the bill, which offered little opportunity for the public to comment. It did not pass.
On fiscal prudence: Ozawa added $3.5 million to the city鈥檚 operating budget, $134 million to the city鈥檚 capital improvement budget and $44 million to HART鈥檚 total budget. The
On respect for others: Here is video of a Waikiki Neighborhood Board meeting on聽 (approximately 1:45:30) 鈥 an exchange between a resident and Ozawa.
Incorrect Statements
There have been several instances in which significant statements made by him have not been correct, beyond what I think would be considered mistakes.
For example, during committee discussions of Bill 66 (2015), Ozawa stated that it was 鈥渙verwhelmingly supported by my district 鈥 every neighborhood board that I have talked to about this.鈥 (Watch the discussion of Bill 66, relating to real property taxes, during the Budget Committee , at about 24:55.)
I checked the agendas of all of the neighborhood boards in District 4, and not one of them had Bill 66 listed for discussion or action.
Another example was during a Hawaii Kai Neighborhood Board . Ozawa stated he made cuts to the HART budget. The record shows, however, that he made no cuts.
Ozawa鈥檚 proposed amendments to Bill 17 (2015), HART鈥檚 operating budget, are available on the last page of . Ozawa did not propose any amendments to , HART鈥檚 capital budget.
In addition, another council member has made reference twice on the public record regarding certain misstatements made by Ozawa.
A discussion of a resolution in the of the Committee on Parks, Community, and Customer Services included comments by another council member regarding certain 鈥渕istruths鈥 that were stated. The comments start at about 29:40. And by a council member to an Ozawa endorsement regarding 鈥渓ies.鈥
Just as important is Ozawa鈥檚 treatment of people. City employees and residents have stated that they feel intimidated and bullied by him. Two people have told me they do not even feel comfortable providing testimony that is different from his position, because they fear retribution.
Others are afraid to 鈥渓ike鈥 posts on Facebook or in any way express their political opinions in public for fear of retaliation.
In short, based on public record and my experience with Ozawa, he does not base his actions on the values noted above, which I believe should be the foundation of good decision-making and working relationships with our elected officials.
As a former candidate for City Council as well as someone who has paid close attention to the council for the past 15 years, my pledge to you is that if Tommy is elected, I will hold him accountable by being vocal about any breaches of his campaign promises, and he is aware of this.
Please vote for Tommy Waters for Honolulu City Council District 4 on Nov. 6.
Thoughts on this or any other story? Write a Letter to the Editor. Send to news@civilbeat.org and put Letter in the subject line. 200 words max. You need to use your name and city and include a contact phone for verification purposes.
You can also comment directly on this story by scrolling down a little further. Comments are subject to approval and we may not publish every one.
GET IN-DEPTH
REPORTING ON HAWAII鈥橲 BIGGEST ISSUES
Every campaign season we get tons of emails and commentary from people supporting or opposing particular candidates. Campaign Corner is a forum for healthy 鈥 and civil 鈥 discussion of candidates and their issues. Endorsements and criticisms are part of a voter鈥檚 decision-making process. Here are the ground rules: The column must be written by an identifiable person and accompanied by a current head shot and brief bio. The commentary must be original and not published elsewhere. No campaign email blasts. No letter-writing campaigns. Send columns and questions to news@civilbeat.org.聽The opinions and information expressed in Campaign Corner are solely those of the authors and not Civil Beat.
Support Independent, Unbiased News
Civil Beat is a nonprofit, reader-supported newsroom based in 贬补飞补颈驶颈. When you give, your donation is combined with gifts from thousands of your fellow readers, and together you help power the strongest team of investigative journalists in the state.