WASHINGTON 鈥 With the swipe of his pen, President Donald Trump nixed a remnant of the late U.S. Sen. Dan Inouye鈥檚 legacy.

On Aug. 2, Trump that had easily passed both chambers of Congress to eliminate a Hawaii-friendly exemption in the Billfish Conservation Act of 2012.

That 2012 measure, which was signed into law by then-President Barack Obama with bipartisan support, effectively made it illegal to import or sell billfish such as marlin or spearfish in the mainland U.S.聽Swordfish was not considered under that legislation.

The only state with an exemption was Hawaii 鈥 thanks to Inouye, a powerful ally of Hawaii鈥檚 commercial fishing industry. Other Pacific insular areas, including Guam, the Northern Mariana Islands and American Samoa, were also allowed to sell billfish on the mainland.

With Inouye out of the picture, so is that exemption.

Hawaii’s longline fleet benefited most when U.S. Sen. Dan Inouye was alive. Nathan Eagle/Civil Beat

More than 550,000 pounds of American-caught billfish landed in Pacific islands have been marketed to the mainland U.S. each year, according to the , also known as Wespac.

The value of that haul last year, the council estimated, was about $830,000 dockside and $2.5 million when considering the wholesale and retail markets.

Hawaii will retain some special status, however, in that fishermen can still catch and sell billfish in the islands, something no other state can do.

Smoked marlin can still be sold in Hawaii, but it can’t be exported to the mainland. Sophie Cocke/Civil Beat

While Wespac opposed the elimination of the exemption for the islands to sell billfish to the mainland, it was popular elsewhere.

鈥淲e鈥檝e done a huge favor for the worldwide population of billfish,鈥 said Jeff Angers, president of the Center for Sportsfishing Policy in Baton Rouge, Louisiana. 鈥淣ow it鈥檚 crystal clear that our focus is on conserving billfish. Period.鈥

Angers was involved in negotiations over the original Billfish Conservation Act in 2012.

Identical versions of this year’s bill were introduced by U.S. Rep. Darren Soto and U.S. Sen. Bill Nelson, two Florida Democrats who sought to close what sportfishing advocates such as Angers saw as a conservation gap.

When Congress passed the original act, Angers said, the purpose was to close off U.S. markets to foreign-caught billfish as a means to drive down demand.

Global stocks were declining, particularly in the Atlantic, and the U.S. was the largest importer of billfish. Smaller populations meant fewer fish not just for eating but for recreational fishermen as well. Marlin and other billfish are prized in the sporting community.

Angers said Inouye was apprehensive about an all-out ban on commercial sales of billfish, in part because it was a traditional and cultural fishery in Hawaii.

He was also getting pressure from Wespac, which advocates for longliners.

Jeff Angers, seen here with a blackfin tuna, advocates for the rights of recreational fishermen across the U.S. Submitted

Angers said conservation advocates showed a lot of deference to Inouye, who had been in the Senate since 1963 and was one of its most powerful members.

鈥淲e learned a lot from Senator Inouye about the cultural traditions of the state of Hawaii,鈥 Angers said. 鈥淚 believe advocates for the bill were happy to accommodate his wishes.鈥

Still, there was concern that Pacific billfish weren’t being managed in a sustainable way. Poachers, too, were a problem. Because of the loophole, Atlantic billfish could be marketed as coming from Hawaii.

Jason Schratwieser, conservation director for the International Game Fish Association, said the intent of the Billfish Conservation Act was not to remove a foreign market and replace it with a domestic one.

But that鈥檚 exactly what happened, he said, when Inouye was able to push through the exemption that allowed Hawaii and other Pacific territories to catch and land billfish commercially to sell on the mainland.

“He was obviously a very powerful figure,” Schratwieser said. “Going into this our focus was on the big problem of the U.S. being the biggest importer of billfish.”

鈥楾hat Power Has Waned鈥

Inouye鈥檚 relationship with Hawaii鈥檚 commercial fishing industry was well-established.

The senator, who died in December 2012, advocated on behalf of the Hawaii Longline Association, Wespac and other interests.

Rick Gaffney is a former Wespac council member and the current head of the Hawaii Fishing and Boating Association. He said Inouye was a conduit for the commercial fishing industry, which had his ear.

鈥淚nouye had a very close relationship with Wespac and the Hawaii Longline Association,鈥 Gaffney said. 鈥淲hen Inouye was in office at his peak they were extraordinarily powerful. Since he鈥檚 left office that power has waned.鈥

The image of the late Sen. Dan Inouye in a tribute film looms over delegates to open of the second day of the Democratic Party of Hawaii State Convention. 5.25.14漏PF Bentley/Civil Beat
Dan Inouye loomed large over Hawaii politics. But he was also a force in Washington. 漏PF Bentley/Civil Beat

The 2018 billfish legislation is a good example. Wespac鈥檚 executive director, Kitty Simonds, opposed the legislation and urged the Trump administration to sink it.

Wespac issued a saying 鈥淎merica鈥檚 seafood consumers may soon be deprived of sustainably harvested domestic marlin products.鈥

According to , Hawaii Congresswoman Colleen Hanabusa wrote an “additional views” memo about the 2018 legislation along with federal representatives from Guam and American Samoa, saying it would 鈥渘egatively impact the livelihoods of the fishermen鈥 in their districts.

鈥淲e support needed conservation efforts in the Atlantic, but do not believe that Pacific fisheries need to be targeted in order to achieve these goals,鈥 they wrote.

The bill passed in the House on a voice vote, meaning any opposition was not recorded. But before the vote was taken, U.S. Rep. Rob Bishop, a Republican from Utah, had the support of 鈥渆verybody and their third cousin.鈥

Eric Kingma, who works for Wespac in international fisheries and enforcement, said the billfish act and the prohibition on sales has always been more of an 鈥淎tlantic issue.鈥

Marlin has basically been a bycatch for Hawaii commercial fishermen, but a lucrative one. NOAA

He said billfish in the Pacific, with the exception of the striped marlin, seem to be doing OK.

鈥淚t鈥檚 really unfortunate this is not going to save any billfish and you鈥檙e not going to get any conservation benefit out of it,鈥 Kingma said.

Meanwhile, fishermen and small business owners who package and sell their products, such as smoked marlin and jerky, will be harmed, he said.

鈥淭his is not just about the longliners,鈥 Kingma said. 鈥淭his conservation act trickles down to the average troller and the weekend warrior who has a marine license to sell the marlin that he caught with his son.鈥

He said the supporters of the legislation are special interests within the recreational fishing community. There鈥檚 a long history of tension between sports and commercial fishermen.

鈥淚n this fight they seem to have persuaded Congress and the president,鈥 Kingma said.

Kitty Simonds, Executive Director Western Pacific Regional Fishery Management Council during Scientific and Statisical Committee meeting held in Honolulu.
Kitty Simonds is the executive director of the Western Pacific Regional Fishery Management Council and a fierce advocate for Hawaii commercial fishermen. Cory Lum/Civil Beat

Gaffney described Hawaii鈥檚 commercial billfish haul, when compared to its main targets of tuna and swordfish, as 鈥済ravy.鈥

It鈥檚 rare longliners would specifically go after billfish unless they needed to fill their holds on the way back home. Instead, most of the billfish come aboard as bycatch, which is then sold off at port.

But, he added, the amount of lost income for fishermen isn鈥檛 something to be shrugged off.

鈥淭hat $800,000 spread out over 120 vessels may make the difference between making it and not making it,鈥 Gaffney said. 鈥淭he longline fleet is not that profitable.鈥

Hawaii Still Getting Special Treatment

U.S. Sen. Brian Schatz, who was appointed to Inouye鈥檚 seat after his death and聽now occupies the same office as Inouye at the Hart Senate building in Washington, has been keeping a close eye on the billfish legislation.

But unlike Inouye, Schatz said he does not believe the commercial benefits of selling billfish outside of Hawaii outweigh the conservation concerns.

Under the new legislation, fishermen will still be able to catch billfish and sell it within Hawaii borders. The same is true for other Pacific islands. Schatz said that鈥檚 why he鈥檚 OK with the exemption being eliminated.

U.S. Sen. Brian Schatz said he believes the commercial fishing industry can sell its excess billfish in state. Nick Grube/Civil Beat

鈥淚t鈥檚 a relatively small fishery 鈥 less than $1 million annually 鈥 and most of it is incidental or bycatch that they鈥檙e making use of in the ahi fleet,鈥 Schatz said. 鈥淚 think we can consume that amount of billfish locally, and to the extent that our fleet can feed our people I think that鈥檚 better policy.鈥

Angers said there might be some conservationists who would argue that all 50 states should take billfish and marlin off the menu. But he鈥檚 not one of them.

鈥淔rankly, 49 out of 50 is pretty darn good,鈥 Angers said. 鈥淵ou should never let the perfect be the enemy of the good.鈥

Thoughts on this or any other story? Write a Letter to the Editor. Send to news@civilbeat.org and put Letter in the subject line. 200 words max. You need to use your name and city and include a contact phone for verification purposes.

Or you can comment directly on this story by scrolling down a little further. We are enabling comments on some stories in the spirit of having a robust community conversation.

Support Independent, Unbiased News

Civil Beat is a nonprofit, reader-supported newsroom based in 贬补飞补颈驶颈. When you give, your donation is combined with gifts from thousands of your fellow readers, and together you help power the strongest team of investigative journalists in the state.

 

About the Author