We are not in a housing crisis. There is no such thing as a permanent crisis.

We have a structural land and housing grab on our hands that requires broad, sweeping changes to the system. In the meantime, let鈥檚 not pass housing policies that deepen inequality by asking Native Hawaiians and locals to subsidize foreign and military ownership of land and homes.

Unfortunately, that is exactly what the Honolulu City Council did last week when it voted to forego property tax revenue for military personnel. Bill 91 encourages more active military to purchase a home in Hawaii, creating uneven advantages for military at the expense of local residents who rely on lower state incomes.

Many active military in Hawaii are likely not Hawaii state residents and are disproportionately likely to move out of state after their duty station in Hawaii. Thus, Bill 91 would disproportionately benefit likely out-of-state residents and shift an additional burden to local residents to make up in the unknown millions in lost property tax revenue.

Pearl Harbor view from Aiea Heights. 15 dec 2014. photograph Cory Lum
The author wants Mayor Caldwell to veto a bill granting property tax breaks to military personnel. Cory Lum/Civil Beat

We already face large budget shortfalls and need revenue for rail and aging infrastructure. A move to have less money in city tax revenues to benefit only military who own homes is unconscionable given the state of housing for locals.

It is unbelievable that during a severe housing shortage, the Honolulu City Council and Chair Ernie Martin did this absent data indicating military members need tax assistance. Military incentives already provide active military a competitive advantage to state residents in the rental market.

For example, military members benefit from down payment-free financing and lower competitive mortgage rates. Our taxes also pay for their cushy housing allowances. Now, military are more able to use these incentives to purchase a house as an investment.

Slap In The Face

This is a slap in the face to Native Hawaiians and struggling local women and families who have demonstrated huge need, but will now be further subsidizing tax breaks to military members.

Acting to provide tax breaks to the benefit of a small group of taxpayers that do not demonstrate need for assistance shows politicians are making self-serving decisions that do not benefit those most in need, especially Native Hawaiians. This also shows a lack of genuine commitment to addressing the structural issues that produce our housing crisis.

Data shows huge disparity in home ownership rates for Native Hawaiians, and indicates local residents continue to only be able to purchase much lower value properties compared to out-of-state residents. We need property tax changes that incentivize local homeownership and property used for longterm rentals, not continuing to incentivize the purchase of homes by non-residents and likely non-owner occupied units.

We cannot afford to let this bill pass.

Ultimately, incentivizing the military to purchase land and homes while here in Hawaii regardless of their income facilitates increased militarization and conversion to feudalism in Hawaii. Again, Native Hawaiians and locals are asked to subsidize military ownership of lands, while remaining a subservient class paying through rents the mortgages of military landlords who have moved on after their temporary station in Hawaii. Hawaiian lands and people are for the enrichment of military and investor class wallets.

Although most of us did not have knowledge of this bill being put into motion or aren鈥檛 able to afford taking off from work to attend the hearings, it is not too late to protect our housing supply. Mayor Kirk Caldwell has until Thursday to veto this damaging bill.

I believe that he will choose to stand with local families against the council鈥檚 misguided leadership. As we are already 24,000 housing units short, this bill will further exacerbate our existing housing climate. We cannot afford to let this bill pass.聽

Thoughts on this or any other story? Write a Letter to the Editor. Send to news@civilbeat.org and put Letter in the subject line. 200 words max. You need to use your name and city and include a contact phone for verification purposes. And you can still comment on stories on.

Community Voices aims to encourage broad discussion on many topics of community interest. It鈥檚 kind of a cross between Letters to the Editor and op-eds. This is your space to talk about important issues or interesting people who are making a difference in our world. Column lengths should be no more than 800 words and we need a current photo of the author and a bio. We welcome video commentary and other multimedia formats. Send to news@civilbeat.org.聽The opinions and information expressed in Community Voices are solely those of the authors and not Civil Beat.

Support Independent, Unbiased News

Civil Beat is a nonprofit, reader-supported newsroom based in 贬补飞补颈驶颈. When you give, your donation is combined with gifts from thousands of your fellow readers, and together you help power the strongest team of investigative journalists in the state.

 

About the Author