A 聽that would have required the state to publish the formulas used to calculate the financial impact of proposed bills died in the Legislature in the recently adjourned session.

That probably came as no surprise to public interest researchers who say the state government needs to be more open about its spending practices.

Hawaii is among the worst in the nation when it comes to being transparent about the way state government spends its money, according to a new of state transparency sites.

The public shouldn’t have to work as hard as it does to understand how the state government spends its money, according to a new study. Flickr.com

The gave the Aloha State an F for transparency, two grades lower than the C it received in the last two years ago. California, Alaska and Wyoming were the only states to score lower.

That鈥檚 because the state鈥檚 transparency hasn鈥檛 updated its information since 2016, said Michelle Sirka, tax and budget campaigns director for the PIRG fund. The same is true for information on the webpage.

The report also found the webpage was glitch-prone and lacked a multi-tiered search function.

Gov. David Ige鈥檚 administration has made strides in improving government accessibility online 鈥 such as modernizing the state and 鈥 but there鈥檚 more to be done, said Christine Mai鈥榠 Sakuda, head of the nonprofit . The agency advocates for a more open and transparent government through technology.

Sakuda wondered whether the state has set a plan and priorities for updating information on its website. It鈥檚 not just the transparency webpage that contains outdated information, she said.

鈥淐learly the data not being up is a reflection of no one鈥檚 eyes are on that and thought that it was important enough to update, which is unfortunate and not acceptable,鈥 Sakuda said.

Brian Black, head of the Civil Beat Law Center for the Public Interest, presented on the issue at a meeting before the state’s聽 last week. Part of the committee鈥檚 role includes developing plans for and assessing state IT systems.

Black鈥檚 testimony, drafted after meeting with groups who support accessible data, suggested the state prioritize posting financial, tax and procurement data, plus certain data from the departments of Health, Commerce and Consumer Affairs, and Land and Natural Resources.

Brian Black from the Civil Beat Law Center presents oral arguments at the Supreme Court, Aliiolani Hale. 1 june 2017
The state plans to use Brian Black’s priorities when deciding what information to post online. Cory Lum/Civil Beat/2017

He recommended the state educate the public on available data and ensure it鈥檚 posted in a timely manner and machine readable format, meaning the file can be easily opened on a computer.

鈥淧roviding a central site for electronic data allows the public to find information efficiently,鈥 Black wrote.

The state plans to follow those priorities when revamping its website, said Todd Nacapuy, head of the , which oversees the transparency webpage.

The spending data won鈥檛 be posted to the transparency site in the immediate future, but Laurel Johnston, head of the , noted it is already to her department鈥檚 webpage.

鈥淭he data is there, it鈥檚 just maybe not the way that PIRG or others might want it so they can compare by state,鈥 Johnston said.

The vendor that the聽Office of Enterprise Technology Services currently uses to host its data, , is expensive, Nacapuy said. A contract with a new vendor should be finalized within the next month and a half 鈥 that鈥檚 when the state will start work on posting the latest spending data to its transparency page.

U.S. PIRG wasn鈥檛 impressed with Hawaii鈥檚 site, but Nacapuy pointed to ETS’s聽, which launched this year.

It breaks down a timeline of IT projects by state department and shows the cost, whether they鈥檙e on track and its project managers. The dashboard ensures accountability of the state鈥檚 IT projects, he said, adding that it鈥檚 the first such site in the nation.

would have required the to make public the formulas used to calculate the financial impact of a bill. It died two weeks ago in conference committee, where lawmakers from both chambers attempt to work out differences.

The wrote in that the availability of information about those estimates was “spotty at best.”

“Having the information would be a great step toward openness and transparency in important legislative decisions,” the group wrote.

The Hawaii Community Foundation鈥檚 Omidyar Ohana Fund supports Transform Hawaii Government. Pierre Omidyar is the CEO and publisher of Civil Beat.

Additionally, The Civil Beat Law Center for the Public Interest is an independent organization created with funding from Pierre Omidyar. Civil Beat Editor Patti Epler sits on its board of directors.

Thoughts on this or any other story? Write a Letter to the Editor. Send to news@civilbeat.org and put Letter in the subject line. 200 words max. You need to use your name and city and include a contact phone for verification purposes. And you can still comment on stories on .

Support Independent, Unbiased News

Civil Beat is a nonprofit, reader-supported newsroom based in 贬补飞补颈驶颈. When you give, your donation is combined with gifts from thousands of your fellow readers, and together you help power the strongest team of investigative journalists in the state.

 

About the Author