Several members of the Honolulu City Council met with the Federal Transit Administration earlier this month as authorized by Resolution 18-38. Their clearly outlines who was at the meeting.

So far, so good.

The report then goes into a brief discussion of the recent five-year and three-year rail tax extensions. Here we run into problems with the numbers 鈥 in both cases, the report erroneously states the general excise tax surcharge as 鈥0.05 percent.鈥 The actual rate is .5 percent. The difference is like saying rail is going to cost $950 million instead of $9.5 billion.

Maybe I noticed this right away because I work with numbers, but this report was signed by three members of the council. It would seem a communication as important as this would have had additional reviews to at least make sure there were no glaring errors.

HART Rail contractors from STG work along Kamehameha Highway.
Rail work along Kamehameha Highway. The author says the city needs to be precise with its data. Cory Lum/Civil Beat

The letter Mayor Kirk Caldwell wrote to the FTA in February also includes the GET surcharge as 0.05 percent. In fact, the wording is very similar to that used in the council report and is also signed by three people. This error is repeated in an attachment to the mayor鈥檚 letter in which he states the city鈥檚 commitment to rail.聽

Everyone makes mistakes, but errors like this seem to be pervasive, including instances in which they are called out and not corrected.

In October, the Council adopted , regarding rail and public-private partnerships. The second 鈥渨hereas鈥 clause indicates that Act 001 of the 2017 Special Session included a 鈥渙ne percent increase鈥 in the transient accommodations tax.

The TAT went from 9.25 percent to 10.25 percent, so the resolution should have stated there was a 鈥渙ne percentage point increase,鈥 or simply that the rate increased from 9.25 percent to 10.25 percent.

Errors like this seem to be pervasive, including instances in which they are called out and not corrected.

The increase in the TAT is actually about 11 percent, not 1 percent. This error was brought up twice in testimony, yet it was not corrected.

What message do these errors send to the 鈥淔TA team鈥 that is still in the process of reviewing the rail recovery plan? How many more errors are included in rail鈥檚 budgets or financial plans?

Several rail-related measures are included on the agenda for Wednesday鈥檚 full Council meeting, including the PIG Report. At least they have an opportunity to correct that one before it gets finalized.

Honolulu Mayor Caldwell’s Letter To The FTA, Feb. 23, 2018:

Editor’s note: Natalie Iwasa is a 2018 candidate for the Honolulu City Council District 4 seat.

Thoughts on this or any other story? Write a Letter to the Editor. Send to news@civilbeat.org and put Letter in the subject line. 200 words max. You need to use your name and city and include a contact phone for verification purposes. And you can still comment on stories on.

Community Voices aims to encourage broad discussion on many topics of community interest. It鈥檚 kind of a cross between Letters to the Editor and op-eds. This is your space to talk about important issues or interesting people who are making a difference in our world. Column lengths should be no more than 800 words and we need a current photo of the author and a bio. We welcome video commentary and other multimedia formats. Send to news@civilbeat.org.聽The opinions and information expressed in Community Voices are solely those of the authors and not Civil Beat.

Support Independent, Unbiased News

Civil Beat is a nonprofit, reader-supported newsroom based in 贬补飞补颈驶颈. When you give, your donation is combined with gifts from thousands of your fellow readers, and together you help power the strongest team of investigative journalists in the state.

 

About the Author