Attorney General recently clarified how the Trump administration intends to treat states that have legalized pot, which remains illegal on the federal level.

The Obama administration eventually took a relatively hands-off approach to this enforcement conundrum. But Sessions instructed all United States attorneys to treat cannabis-related activities like any suspected crime, instead of making them a low priority if they comply with state laws.

This bureaucratic salvo is stirring fears that the Trump administration could be on the verge of a crackdown that could potentially jeopardize the nation鈥檚 growing number of . However, based on my research and what I鈥檝e learned while teaching the first U.S. at the University of Denver, I see no reason for supporters of legalization to panic.

In fact, I believe that Sessions may have actually accelerated the process toward federal marijuana legalization.

Will the federal crackdown on marijuana encourage legalization? PF Bentley/Civil Beat

Obama鈥檚 Approach

First, a little history.

became the first state to legalize medical marijuana in 1996. and other states soon followed.

Since the federal government considers pot to be a and makes using and selling marijuana for any reason , this put the authorities in an awkward position. Key members of the Clinton administration responded with . General Barry McCaffrey, the drug czar, said at the time, 鈥淲e should ask ourselves whether we really want Cheech and Chong logic to guide our thinking about medicine.鈥 Raids and .

President also expressed hostility toward medical marijuana, making its growing number of raids on legal dispensaries come as no great surprise. In 2005, as his second term began, the that federal powers trumped states鈥 rights in this regard.

As a , Barack Obama suggested that he might not interfere with the power of what was by then about a dozen states to allow medicinal marijuana sales and use. In 2009, his deputy attorney general, David Ogden, that furthered this impression. It said that small-scale operators in states where medical marijuana was legal were a low enforcement priority.

But Obama鈥檚 administration executed anyway, disappointing .

During Obama鈥檚 second term, the number of states that had climbed past the 20 mark. A handful, starting with , also legalized recreational weed. Meanwhile, support for legal pot in general.

Four years after the Ogden memo, , another deputy attorney general, issued a more comprehensive memo. It directed all to treat marijuana businesses operating 鈥渋n clear and unambiguous compliance鈥 with state marijuana laws as a low enforcement priority.

While still somewhat ambiguous and falling short of support for full federal legalization, Cole鈥檚 guidance made cannabis businesses in states that had legalized the product feel less vulnerable.

Rather than fight for more protection against federal raids, marijuana entrepreneurs and social activists at that point instead generally chose to focus on compliance within state laws and continuing to increase public support.

The strategy seemed to pay off with additional states legalizing pot for medical and recreational purposes. While full legalization remained an appealing long-term goal for many Americans, the status quo during Obama鈥檚 second term seemed quite workable for states with legal markets. And it took away the impetus to push for more rapid federal change.

Trump Takes Over

As soon as President Donald Trump named Sessions as his pick for attorney general, the Alabama Republican鈥檚 triggered speculation that the federal government would .

Instead, Sessions waited almost a full year to make a move. Meanwhile, legal cannabis businesses continued to and create jobs. , the world鈥檚 largest. And more and more Americans were exposed to the industry in their home states or while traveling.

Indeed, a Pew Research Center poll conducted in October found that 鈥 up from 57 percent a year earlier and nearly double the backing for legal pot in 2000. For the first time, Gallup polling determined, a support legalization.

Even when Sessions finally acted, he took a relatively mild step. Rather than launching a more severe crackdown, such as immediately raiding marijuana businesses, he merely rescinded Cole鈥檚 guidance.

Bigger Coalition

The way state lawmakers, attorneys general, industry participants and other stakeholders reacted to even this small gesture demonstrated something that Sessions seems to have failed to consider 鈥 that the coalition in support of marijuana legalization had .

State lawmakers in , , and other states, and even some of the , objected. A group of 54 House and Senate Democrats sent Trump a letter urging him to reverse course.

鈥淭his action has the potential to unravel efforts to build sensible drug policies that encourage economic development as we are finally moving away from antiquated practices that have hurt disadvantaged communities,鈥 they wrote.

, who do not report to Sessions, such as those serving in , , and , have shown no interest in modifying their current practices.

And urged Congress to so that marijuana businesses in their states would no longer have to rely solely on cash to handle billions of dollars in legal pot transactions. That way, they wrote, their revenue could be fully tracked, aiding taxation and limiting criminal activity that targets cash-intensive businesses.

Jerred Kiloh, owner of the Higher Path medical marijuana dispensary, getting ready to pay his monthly tax payment in cash in Los Angeles. ()

All in all, the fierce reaction across the political spectrum reaction shows two things: Sessions鈥 memo is an empty threat and pot鈥檚 days as an illegal drug are numbered.

To be sure, the Sessions memo does seem to have who were considering new pot investments. But by adding to the air of uncertainty around marijuana businesses, Sessions seems have only strengthened the resolve of pro-legalization forces.

The ConversationI believe it will ultimately bring about federal legalization sooner rather than later.

This article was originally published on . Read the .

Support Independent, Unbiased News

Civil Beat is a nonprofit, reader-supported newsroom based in 贬补飞补颈驶颈. When you give, your donation is combined with gifts from thousands of your fellow readers, and together you help power the strongest team of investigative journalists in the state.

 

About the Author