Many of us have already decided that things will be different in 2018. We鈥檒l eat better, get more exercise, save more money or finally get around to decluttering those closets.

But by the time February rolls around, most of us 鈥 of the Americans who make New Year鈥檚 resolutions 鈥 will have already given up.

Why does our self-control falter, so often leaving us to revert to our old ways? The answer to this question has consequences beyond our waistlines and bank balances.

Psychologists and economists have traditionally fallen into two seemingly contradictory camps about how self-control works. But recent research conducted by my colleagues and me suggests the in each of us.

ON THE RUN Charging down the beach in fins, a bodyboarder approaches the water On September 16, 2014
Getting active is a favorite New Year’s resolution and one that’s hard to stick with. PF Bentley/Civil Beat

Self-Control: A Battery Or A Snowball?

A well-known series of in the 1960s and 鈥70s asked children to choose between getting one marshmallow right away or waiting a few minutes and getting two marshmallows. Researchers found that the , able to resist eating that first marshmallow even when no one else was around, tended to in terms of SAT scores and educational attainment, employment, health and other major measures of success.

For those kids, self-control 鈥 not how intelligent, wealthy or educated their families were, or any other identified factor 鈥 was the main driver of their later success. In other words, the ability to delay gratification helps in virtually all aspects of life.

But researchers have had trouble nailing down where self-control comes from and how it works. For decades, studies of self-control in short-term decision-making have led to two clear, but seemingly contradictory, results.

One model suggested that self-control is a if you lean on it too heavily, like a battery that loses its charge over time. Someone who resists the urge to eat a doughnut for breakfast, for example, might give in to the temptation of a cookie later in the afternoon. Each little demonstration of self-control throughout the day ends up exhausting the limited reserves.

The alternative model suggested that . Not eating the doughnut might increase your motivation and confidence to stick with a healthy diet 鈥 like a snowball that gets bigger as it builds momentum rolling downhill.

So is self-control something you run out of when it鈥檚 overtaxed? Or is it something that you get better at the more you 鈥減ractice鈥? The debate continued as different research groups investigated the question in various ways 鈥 and came up with contradictory evidence for which model best explains the inner workings of self-control.

Using Biometrics To Tell The Whole Story

Part of the problem has been how hard it is to conduct behavioral research. Traditional methods assume that test subjects fully understand the questions they鈥檙e asked and give honest answers. Unfortunately, researchers had no practical way of knowing whether this was the case, or whether they actually measured what they intended to.

But here at the nation鈥檚 largest biometrics lab, my figured out a new way to investigate the question that didn鈥檛 rely on just what volunteers report to us.

So is self-control something you run out of when it鈥檚 overtaxed? Or is it something that you get better at the more you 鈥減ractice鈥?

We designed a two-part experiment. First, we asked subjects to focus on a red bull鈥檚-eye at the bottom of a computer screen for either six or 30 minutes. This task requires volunteers to exert self-control 鈥 it鈥檚 tempting to look away from the boring, unchanging bull鈥檚-eye to the animated video playing elsewhere on the screen.

Then subjects participated in a second laboratory task meant to measure impulsive buying: They could conserve a real US$5 cash endowment or purchase several household items on-site they hadn鈥檛 been looking to obtain. The task is analogous to going to the store and buying products that aren鈥檛 on your list. The idea is that self-control helps individuals reign in these impulse purchases.

The bull鈥檚-eye for subjects to focus on is at the bottom of the screen. In this image, eye tracking technology lets the researcher precisely monitor how many times, and when, subjects deviated from the instructions. Marco A. Palma

Our innovation was that we did not have to assume people fully complied with the video-watching task 鈥 we were actually able to measure it via their physiological responses. By tracking eye movements, we could quantify very precisely when participants stuck to staring at the bull鈥檚-eye 鈥 that is, when their self-control was keeping them on task. We also measured facial expression and brain activity for a clearer understanding of what was going on with each subject.

Basically, we found that .

For a while, most people could focus on the boring bull鈥檚-eye. But they鈥檇 hit a fatigue point. After that, if subjects hung in there and still stuck with the task, they ended up exhausting their self-control 鈥渂attery.鈥

We could see this by looking at how many impulse buys they made in the second half of the study. If they鈥檇 pushed past the fatigue threshold in the previous task, they showed less self-control and ended up making more impulsive purchases. This pattern was shown in both what they 鈥渂ought鈥 in our experiment and also in the brain: The prefrontal cortex showed patterns indicative of impulse-buying behavior.

On the other hand, subjects who eased off once they鈥檇 reached the fatigue threshold had a different experience. They remained in the 鈥渟nowball鈥 stage of self-control 鈥 they practiced the skill a bit, but didn鈥檛 overdo it to the point of exhaustion. In the next task, their brains didn鈥檛 exhibit the typical impulse-buying activity patterns. Exercising self-control on the bull鈥檚-eye task, but not overdoing it, led to more self-control in our second task. These subjects did better at controlling impulse purchases than the other group of subjects who didn鈥檛 have the initial bull鈥檚-eye-watching session that turned out to rev up self-control.

Our study suggests that self-control has the qualities of both snowball and battery: Exhibiting self-control once makes it easier to do so again a short time later, but overdoing it initially makes us more likely to give up altogether.

How To Make It Past Feb. 1

Our new understanding of self-control provides lessons for sticking with those New Year鈥檚 resolutions.

First, remember that slow and steady is best. If you want to get fit, start by walking around the block, not running five miles. Achieve enough to stay motivated, but don鈥檛 overdo it to the point of frustration. Don鈥檛 burn out your self-control battery.

Second, remember that . Instead of drastically cutting all carbs or sugar out of your diet, consider giving up just one piece of bread or one can of soda per day. Over time, consuming fewer calories per day will result in gradual weight loss.

And finally, realize that little acts of self-control in one area will improve your self-control in other areas. Getting traction with a healthier diet, for example, will increase your confidence and motivation to achieve another goal. As the self-control snowball gains some momentum, you鈥檒l get better and better at sticking to your objectives.

The ConversationA more apt metaphor for our new understanding of self control is that it鈥檚 like a muscle. You can overdo it and exhaust it if you overexert yourself beyond your capabilities. But with consistent training it can get stronger and stronger.

This article was originally published on . Read the .

Support Independent, Unbiased News

Civil Beat is a nonprofit, reader-supported newsroom based in 贬补飞补颈驶颈. When you give, your donation is combined with gifts from thousands of your fellow readers, and together you help power the strongest team of investigative journalists in the state.

 

About the Author