During this year鈥檚 legislative session, various聽forms of tax relief are being considered.

Terms being bandied about include exemptions, deductions, and tax聽credits, and among tax credits there are the 鈥淐reditAbles鈥 鈥 refundable, nonrefundable聽and assignable credits.

An 鈥渆xemption鈥 or 鈥渆xclusion鈥 describes something that normally would be聽subject to tax 鈥 an item of income, perhaps 鈥 and says it won鈥檛 count toward figuring聽your tax. A 鈥渄eduction鈥 describes something that may or may not be subject to tax in聽the first place 鈥 such as an expense 鈥 and will be subtracted when figuring your tax.

For personal income tax purposes, for example, a payment you get from an employer to聽reimburse you for bills you paid on your employer鈥檚 behalf is an exemption (payments from聽your employer are normally taxable), but interest you paid to the bank on your mortgage聽is a deduction.

Exemptions or deductions can be worth a little or a lot, depending on the tax rate.聽For state income tax where you are in the 8.25 percent bracket, for example, a $100聽exemption or exclusion would change your tax bill by $8.25.

Tax credits don鈥檛 reduce the income on which the tax is based. Instead, tax聽credits reduce tax directly. Different kinds of CreditAbles work differently, however.

Refundable credits are functionally the same as cash. You can pay your tax bill聽with refundable credits, and if there are credits left over after all the tax is paid, the聽government will write you a check for the difference, just as if you paid your tax with the聽same amount of money.

Typically, the Department of Taxation doesn鈥檛 like聽refundable credits. They鈥檙e a lot of work, and involve more than one agency because聽under our system DOTAX can鈥檛 cut refund checks. Instead, a refund request needs to聽go through DOTAX鈥檚 checks and balances to the Department of Accounting and聽General Services, and those folks, after going through their own checks and balances,听cut and mail the checks.

I still wonder why DOTAX can鈥檛 cut its own checks.

Nonrefundable credits are a lot less work because they are like store coupons.聽You can pay your tax bill with nonrefundable credits, but if there are any left over after聽your tax for the year is paid, no check is forthcoming. Instead, you need to wait for聽another occasion to use the credits 鈥 next year鈥檚 tax, perhaps.

With assignable credits, the coupons can be bought and sold. The concept聽addresses nonrefundable credits that are earned by folks who typically don鈥檛 pay state聽tax, such as nonprofit charities or out-of-state organizations. A store coupon against tax聽is useless when you aren鈥檛 paying tax, but would be worth something to a person who聽does owe tax.

In states that offer assignable credits, the credits typically trade at a聽small discount to compensate the buyer for the trouble it is going through. That鈥檚 one聽way a tax credit can be made valuable to a non-taxpayer without making the credit聽refundable.

Putting this knowledge to work, one of the earlier drafts of a bill being considered聽by the聽Legislature made a certain credit refundable and assignable. We said it didn鈥檛聽make sense. Who would want to buy or sell cash? Fortunately, the powers that be saw聽the absurdity and got rid of the assignability feature.

It turned out that the bill author聽wasn鈥檛 thinking about having taxpayers make a market to sell the credits, but wanted聽something slightly different, which might be accounted for in the next bill draft.

That covers our list of CreditAbles. We trust that it will make the discussion of聽tax credits and incentives more understandable, and help make our tax system more聽tolerable.

Community Voices aims to encourage broad discussion on many topics of community interest. It鈥檚 kind of a cross between Letters to the Editor and op-eds. This is your space to talk about important issues or interesting people who are making a difference in our world. Column lengths should be no more than 800 words and we need a current photo of the author and a bio. We welcome video commentary and other multimedia formats. Send to news@civilbeat.org.聽The opinions and information expressed in Community Voices are solely those of the authors and not Civil Beat.

We need your help.

Unfortunately, being named a聽finalist for a聽Pulitzer prize聽doesn’t make us immune to financial pressures. The fact is,聽our revenue hasn鈥檛 kept pace with our need to grow,听.

Civil Beat is a nonprofit, reader-supported newsroom based in 贬补飞补颈驶颈. We鈥檙e looking to build a more resilient, diverse and deeply impactful media landscape, and聽we hope you鈥檒l help by .

About the Author