Just about everyone recognizes that no one is perfect. Everyone makes mistakes at one point or another, including government agencies and employees. With respect to Honolulu鈥檚 rail project, errors and inconsistencies have been found in ridership 鈥渞aw data鈥 projections, the monthly FACTs newspaper ad, HART鈥檚 monthly progress report, its most recent draft business plan and even at least once in a Project Management Oversight Committee report as well as other documents.

Given the amount of errors I鈥檝e discovered, I felt it important to follow up on projections that were brought up during a Feb. 15 joint Senate committee hearing regarding . SB聽1183 and its drafts deal with funding rail construction, and the projections that were mentioned go out to 2047.

HART Rail Train Number 1. 2 may 2016.
HART’s rail train No 1. Cory Lum/Civil Beat

On Feb. 24, I sent HART a request for the summary and details of the 2047 projections. On March 3, I was informed that my request cannot be granted, because the 鈥淎gency does not maintain the records.鈥 In about 10 years of requesting documents, this is the first time my request was turned down for this reason.

The mayor and HART representatives were questioned by senators about these projections, and I recently discovered that HART did provide the summary projection to Sen. Les Ihara on Feb. 15. (See council communication D-092(17).) According to HART鈥檚 response to my request, however, they apparently no longer have that record or the details underlying the projections.

At this point, I鈥檓 not sure which is worse 鈥 all of the errors that I鈥檝e found or the fact that HART is not maintaining certain records that are important for political representatives making significant financial decisions on our behalf.

One thing is crystal clear to me, however. We cannot continue to blindly follow HART and the rail project on its current path. Too much is at stake, and when these types of stumbling blocks (or whatever you鈥檇 like to call them) are present, it is all the more reason to stop and reassess.

The residents and taxpayers of Oahu deserve no less, and I hope senators will consider that when they convene on Tuesday聽for third reading on SB 1183, SD2.

Community Voices aims to encourage broad discussion on many topics of community interest. It鈥檚 kind of a cross between Letters to the Editor and op-eds. This is your space to talk about important issues or interesting people who are making a difference in our world. Column lengths should be no more than 800 words and we need a current photo of the author and a bio. We welcome video commentary and other multimedia formats. Send to news@civilbeat.org.聽The opinions and information expressed in Community Voices are solely those of the authors and not Civil Beat.

We need your help.

Unfortunately, being named a聽finalist for a聽Pulitzer prize聽doesn’t make us immune to financial pressures. The fact is,聽our revenue hasn鈥檛 kept pace with our need to grow,听.

Civil Beat is a nonprofit, reader-supported newsroom based in 贬补飞补颈驶颈. We鈥檙e looking to build a more resilient, diverse and deeply impactful media landscape, and聽we hope you鈥檒l help by .

About the Author