Election season in Hawaii is already underway, having just completed Republican and Democratic votes for president.
With the June 7 filing deadline for state contests fast approaching, we can expect those ubiquitous campaign signs to start cropping up all over.
But, do they actually help persuade voters? Maybe not.
from the聽 at聽Harvard University sought to gauge the聽effectiveness of lawn signs in particular.
The study’s main conclusions:
- After pooling the results of the four experiments and examining their averages, it appears that lawn signs raise vote shares, on average, by slightly more than 1 percentage point.
- Based on pooled results, lawn signs are 鈥渙n par with other low-tech campaign tactics such as direct mail that generate 鈥 effects that tend to be small in magnitude.鈥
- Signs, in some scenarios, do not appear to be as effective when they make reference to a specific political party or ideology.
Bottom line: “While lawn signs appear to have a modest effect on voting outcomes, they could, theoretically, provide an edge in certain tight elections.”
GET IN-DEPTH REPORTING ON HAWAII鈥橲 BIGGEST ISSUES
Support Independent, Unbiased News
Civil Beat is a nonprofit, reader-supported newsroom based in 贬补飞补颈驶颈. When you give, your donation is combined with gifts from thousands of your fellow readers, and together you help power the strongest team of investigative journalists in the state.
About the Author
-
Chad Blair is the politics editor for Civil Beat. You can reach him by email at cblair@civilbeat.org or follow him on Twitter at .