Decision making in Rep. Karl Rhoads House Judiciary Committee on legislation requiring聽body-worn cameras and vehicle cameras for county police departments and some money to help them pay for it.聽
聽received similar聽testimony as聽to what was heard when the measure聽moved its way through the Senate:
- it’s opposed by several county police departments because they聽are moving on their own programs to implement body-cams;
- the Office of Information Practices worries it will be swamped with requests to view videos and so it seeks聽more financial support;
- the Civil Beat Law Center, which opposes the breadth of the confidential provision that could limit availability聽of the videos and thus restrict the public’s right to know; and
- the ACLU of Hawaii’s position that body-cams reduce use of police force and complaints against officers.
It does seem, however, there is general consensus building that body cameras for cops are here to stay, that advanced technology can help address聽storage issues and redaction challenges; a camera-use聽policy drawn up by the Kauai Police Department with the input of SHOPO, the police union, that could be a template for聽the other county police departments; and that the cameras will help the public and press as much as it will help the police.
Meanwhile, another measure, , seeks to clarify under what circumstances聽a member of the public can use a camera to film a police officer in a public place.
As a explained, the widespread use of smartphones has led to evidence being used in police conduct matters. But when does that use obstruct the police, when does it violate privacy and when is it of public (and media) interest?
Law enforcement聽expressed reservations聽as the bill moved through the Senate, and the legislation聽was amended. The ACLU, meantime, says the matter is a 1st Amendment rights issue.
But Aaron Hunger, a former cop and now doctoral student, said he could聽also see concerns about people with聽cameras getting in an officer’s face and preventing him or her from doing their job. It’s a matter of striking a balance.
Decision making on SB 2411 is also set for Tuesday in House聽Judiciary.
GET IN-DEPTH REPORTING ON HAWAII鈥橲 BIGGEST ISSUES
Support Independent, Unbiased News
Civil Beat is a nonprofit, reader-supported newsroom based in 贬补飞补颈驶颈. When you give, your donation is combined with gifts from thousands of your fellow readers, and together you help power the strongest team of investigative journalists in the state.
About the Author
-
Chad Blair is the politics editor for Civil Beat. You can reach him by email at cblair@civilbeat.org or follow him on X at .