It鈥檚 easy to criticize Donald Trump. We say that he鈥檚 making a mockery of American politics, that he鈥檚 adding hate-fueled fodder to the fire of extremism, and that he represents a growing racist divide in America.

And we鈥檙e right. But the same percentage of Americans support Donald Trump as . His name will soon be buried in the sand of history. Just another hate-mongering demagogue who never made it into elected office.

Even though we know that he will never get elected, getting mired down in a debate over personality is easier than facing our actual complex and systemic issues. And Trump鈥檚 complete lack of ethics and human decency allow me to brush aside my own moral failings in a warm blanket of liberal self-righteous condemnation.

What’s more important: The looming disaster of climate change or the latest uttering of Donald Trump? NASA

 

If you give your dog a treat every time that he barks, what happens? And then whose fault is it when he barks all day long? Yet we continue to give Donald Trump exactly .

His rise isn鈥檛 the result of hate-spewing extremist Republicans 鈥 it鈥檚 our visceral reaction that is fueling him and his rabid band of supporters. So it鈥檚 time to ignore them. The systemic issues that we face are too grave for us to get bogged down in a fight with bigots. We should be discussing policy, not personality.

There were 30,000 diplomats and delegates working hard in Paris to hash out a plan to keep global warming below 2 degrees.

If you are a political junkie, then the United Nations conference on climate change (COP21) was a turning point in human history. The largest-ever gathering of world leaders represented unprecedented coordination toward solving a global issue.

Yet, if you are a climate scientist or live on a low-lying Pacific island, then COP21 is too little, too late聽after two decades of underwhelming inaction.

And, if you are a Republican politician, then COP21 will lead to the destruction of the U.S. economy. The largest-ever gathering of world leaders represents a left wing plot to take over the government.

While the first , the third is not. The GOP is lying.

Yet, congressional Republicans are, once again, opposition to any climate deal coming out of Paris. In the last Republican debate聽聽that 鈥渨e鈥檙e not going to destroy our economy (fighting climate change) the way the left-wing government we鈥檙e under wants us to.鈥

In the same debate, Chris Christie said, 鈥淲e shouldn鈥檛 be destroying our economy in order to chase some wild, left-wing idea.鈥 聽he probably would have skipped the Paris climate summit if he were president. And he also made sure to mention that action to avert climate change will 鈥渄estroy鈥 our economy.

Let me be clear, there is no debate on climate change. The evidence has been . And action to mitigate the effects is not going to destroy our economy.

California has the most ambitious climate regulations in the country, it has the聽, and it has聽cut per capita emissions by 25 percent since 1990. It has done all of that while increasing聽,聽nearly leading the world in green technology investment (second only to the U.S. as a whole), leading the nation in job creation, and maintaining a balanced budget.

While the rest of the world by the fact that America has the on the planet, we鈥檙e being sidetracked by partisan politics.

Yet, instead of calling them out on it and demanding action on climate change, we鈥檙e talking about Trump鈥檚 聽In the biggest week of climate action in history, 鈥淒onald Trump鈥 was聽聽more Google searches than 鈥渃limate change.鈥

In our infatuation with reality TV and superstars, we spend more time talking about people than we do about policy. Invariably, every climate-denier ends their argument by saying that Al Gore has a big house. But climate change isn鈥檛 about Al Gore or Donald Trump. And the fight for a stable climate doesn鈥檛 end at the ballot box.

Even if the framework adopted at COP21 is successful, we could see upwards of by the middle of the century. To put that into perspective, our current xenophobic outburst is because President Obama wants to accept just 10,000 Syrian refugees into the U.S.

And, unlike most refugees, we can鈥檛 temporarily house those displaced by climate change until the hostilities are over. They鈥檝e lost their ancestral homes; they have nowhere to go back to. And most of them They won鈥檛 be coming ashore in Turkey or Lebanon, but right here in Hawaii. This is our responsibility.

unparalleled in modern politics. And he allows us to stand clearly on the right side of history as we criticize him. Climate change doesn鈥檛 give us that same clear moral line. As Americans than any other country in the world. It鈥檚 that complicity which makes the solutions so difficult to face.

But we need to stop so that we can give more airtime to those who are trying to make the complex and nuanced policy decisions that are necessary for a stable climate.

Community Voices aims to encourage broad discussion on many topics of community interest. It鈥檚 kind of a cross between Letters to the Editor and op-eds. This is your space to talk about important issues or interesting people who are making a difference in our world. Column lengths should be no more than 800 words and we need a current photo of the author and a bio. We welcome video commentary and other multimedia formats. Send to news@civilbeat.org.聽The opinions and information expressed in Community Voices are solely those of the authors and not Civil Beat.

Support Independent, Unbiased News

Civil Beat is a nonprofit, reader-supported newsroom based in 贬补飞补颈驶颈. When you give, your donation is combined with gifts from thousands of your fellow readers, and together you help power the strongest team of investigative journalists in the state.

 

About the Author