Hawaii Rep. Tulsi Gabbard Needs to Answer Questions About Chief of Staff
A controversial staff hire and her persistent digs at the president have caused many to question the congresswoman. Whether the criticism endures depends in large part on her.
Over the past two years, U.S. Rep. Tulsi Gabbard has been the congresswoman who could do no wrong. The telegenic, rising political star has enjoyed a largely uncritical media spotlight, the likes of which is hardly ever afforded a new representative with a relatively short political resume.
And she鈥檚 played in that environment like a pro. Here she is in the New York Times, there on CNN, and she is the rare Democratic official who regularly appears on Fox News.聽 It鈥檚 been quite an impressive phenomenon.
But in recent weeks, she鈥檚 encountered her first major bumps in the road, and they鈥檙e providing a different look at the second-term congresswoman.
As Civil Beat editorialized recently, Gabbard鈥檚 dogged, ongoing crusade against the president鈥檚 restrained public characterizations of terrorists has left many observers scratching their heads.
Then last week, a new issue arose that raises fresh questions: the appointment of a longtime friend with scant political experience, and none in Washington, D.C., to serve as her chief of staff.
Stories in Civil Beat and featured criticisms from prominent political figures and pundits calling the selection of Kainoa Ramananda Penaroza 鈥渦nusual,鈥 bizarre,鈥 鈥減erplexing鈥 and 鈥渘ot a choice that nearly any other member of Congress鈥 would make.
Whether hiring Penaroza turns out to be a strong or poor decision, it鈥檚 another high-profile matter in which the representative鈥檚 judgment is being called into question. 聽Gabbard might have helped allay concerns by explaining her choice more completely. Instead, she hastily put out a news release announcing Penaroza鈥檚 hire after Civil Beat first began to ask questions, and then she refused further comment on the matter.
It鈥檚 a strategy that rarely works in today鈥檚 digital environment.聽 Fueled by speculation and past media coverage of the Gabbard family鈥檚 religious affiliations, the matter has mushroomed on message boards and social media. As of Sunday, posts of the stories on Civil Beat, HNN and Huffington Post had drawn many hundreds of comments from critics and defenders.
Gabbard would be well advised to recall an old political maxim: A little transparency goes a long way.聽 Constituents and the media who serve them often seek answers to difficult questions, and the manner in which elected officials answer them 鈥 or don鈥檛 鈥 can play a significant role in how voters ultimately perceive them.
One unorthodox staffing choice and her recurring semantics beef with the President shouldn鈥檛 overly characterize an otherwise solid record of service. Whether they will is entirely up to Rep. Gabbard.
GET IN-DEPTH REPORTING ON HAWAII鈥橲 BIGGEST ISSUES
Support Independent, Unbiased News
Civil Beat is a nonprofit, reader-supported newsroom based in 贬补飞补颈驶颈. When you give, your donation is combined with gifts from thousands of your fellow readers, and together you help power the strongest team of investigative journalists in the state.