Recently there was some news from the state of Colorado.

Voters there had passed a Taxpayers鈥 Bill of Rights (TBOR) as an amendment to the Colorado Constitution. Under the TBOR, tax increases and significant government borrowing had to be presented to the voters before they could take effect.

Some of the Colorado legislators, however, sued in federal court. Their argument was that the U.S. Constitution guarantees Colorado a 鈥渞epublican form of government,鈥 and because the voters severely limited the power of the legislature to tax and spend, 鈥渃ore functions鈥 of government, Colorado now falls short of that standard.

Flickr.com

The key defendant in that suit, Gov. John Hickenlooper, asked the court to toss out the suit. The court thought the case worthy of a trial, and let the suit go forward. The governor went to the Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals, which came to the same conclusion.

Other federal courts, including the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals that hears cases from Hawaii, said that this kind of case involves a 鈥減olitical question鈥 and deserves to be thrown out of court.

Typically, the courts hear cases where someone or some company is accused of breaching some duty or some contract. Rules of law are applied, and those rules give rise to the outcome.

Political question suits are those in an area where there are few or no rules, so the question presented for decision is a policy choice. Generally, legislators make policy choices, and judges apply rules of law.

Legislators vote on policy choices and aren鈥檛 supposed to come crying to the court system when their votes are not with the majority. Here, we really don鈥檛 know details of what a 鈥渞epublican form of government鈥 is. We do know that a monarchy, which is what we used to have in Hawaii, doesn鈥檛 qualify, but we鈥檙e not sure how republican the government has to be. In particular, there aren鈥檛 established rules about how much freedom to tax and spend a legislature needs to have.

In any event, we now have different federal appeals courts reaching different conclusions, so it may be time for the U.S. Supreme Court to step in.

To me the underlying question is simpler: Who鈥檚 the Boss? Does the government exist to serve the people, or do the people exist to serve the government?

One hallmark of the government we have in the United States is that there are limitations so government doesn鈥檛 run roughshod over the people. We have courts to uphold these limits and strike down any attempts by our government to seize too much power.

Think of the federal Bill of Rights. Those amendments to the U.S. Constitution contain limits on governmental power that must be respected by federal and all state governments. TBOR in Colorado is aptly named because it also is a limitation on governmental power.

Here in Hawaii, we haven鈥檛 gone as far as Colorado voters have gone, but our constitution contains a balanced budget requirement, as well as a spending limit. Our legislators are certainly not free to tax and spend as much as they want. If the Supreme Court comes out and rules against the TBOR, then those limitations may be invalid; but the question remains: Who鈥檚 the Boss?

The Tenth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution says, 鈥淭he powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.鈥

Article I, section 1 of the Hawaii Constitution says: 鈥淎ll political power of this State is inherent in the people and the responsibility for the exercise thereof rests with the people. All government is founded on this authority.鈥

If we believe these statements, then we know who the boss is.

 

Community Voices aims to encourage broad discussion on many topics of community interest. It鈥檚 kind of a cross between Letters to the Editor and op-eds. This is your space to talk about important issues or interesting people who are making a difference in our world. Column lengths should be no more than 800 words and we need a current photo of the author and a bio. We welcome video commentary and other multimedia formats. Send to news@civilbeat.org.聽The opinions and information expressed in Community Voices are solely those of the authors and not Civil Beat.

Support Independent, Unbiased News

Civil Beat is a nonprofit, reader-supported newsroom based in 贬补飞补颈驶颈. When you give, your donation is combined with gifts from thousands of your fellow readers, and together you help power the strongest team of investigative journalists in the state.

 

About the Author