By a large majority 鈥� 61 percent to 25 percent 鈥� Hawaii voters do not want to raise the mandatory retirement age for judges and justices from 70 to 80.

By an even larger margin 鈥� 70 percent to 13 percent 鈥� voters聽also want to have the names of nominees for judges and justices released to the public.

But voters are torn about whether the state should allow the use of public money for private preschool programs. Forty-five聽percent oppose the idea, 40聽percent support it and 12 percent are unsure.

Those numbers are from聽The Civil Beat Poll, conducted聽by聽聽We聽surveyed聽1,055聽registered voters statewide Sept. 11-14. The聽poll sample included 75 percent land lines and 25 percent cell phones and聽has a margin of error of 3 percent.

The Hawaii Supreme Court 2014

The Hawaii Supreme Court in mid-2014: Paula Nakayama, Richard Pollack, Chief Justice Mark Recktenwald, Michael Wilson and Sabrina McKenna.

Hawaii State Judiciary

There are five constitutional amendment questions on the Nov. 4聽ballot.

Civil Beat did not survey voters on聽question No. 2 asking for聽the use of special purpose revenue bonds for agricultural projects, or on question No. 5 asking for聽the use of special purpose revenue bonds to improve dams and reservoirs. Neither issue attracted opposition as the legislation moved through the Hawaii Legislature this spring.

That is not the case, however, with the other three constitutional amendments.

Question No. 1:聽Disclosure of Nominees

The state’s Judicial Selection Commission amended its rules in 2011 to publicly release the names of judicial nominees when they are submitted to the governor or chief justice. If the this ballot question is approved, mandatory disclosure would be part of the Hawaii constitution.

The issue boils down to transparency versus confidentiality, and voters surveyed by Civil Beat favor transparency. The measure is widely favored across demographic categories, including political.

In fact, those calling themselves liberal, moderate or conservative or Democrat, independent or Republican agreed in high percentages that question No. 1 deserves a “yes” vote.

Question No. 3:聽Retirement Age of Judges

The argument in favor of raising the mandatory retirement age for judges and justices from 70 to 80 is that many聽are more than聽capable of continuing to serve with distinction. The counter-argument says the bench benefits by having fresher faces.

Voters surveyed by Civil Beat聽are clear on this question: Don’t raise the age. For the most part, the same people who support releasing the names of judicial nominees oppose changing the retirement age.

Voters’ gender, age, ethnicity and income level didn’t matter on this issue.

Question No. 4: Public Money for Preschool

The constitutional聽amendment that has received the most attention asks voters to allow the use of taxpayer money for private preschool programs.

Supporters, starting with Gov. Neil Abercrombie,听say the amendment is critical聽to establishing an early education system here and could聽expand聽access to preschool for thousands of 4-year-olds who miss out because their families can鈥檛 afford it.

Opponents,听including state Sen. David Ige, who defeated Abercrombie to become the Democratic nominee for governor, and the Hawaii State Teachers Association,听don’t want聽state funds going to聽private providers. They argue the proposal聽is ill-conceived and expensive.

As noted above, voters surveyed by Civil Beat are divided on this issue, with a slight plurality opposing the ballot question. Those who identify as liberal say they will vote “yes” while moderates and conservatives say they will vote “no.”

Fifty percent of voters belonging to union households oppose question No. 4 with just 38 percent in support. And, the more聽money one makes, the less likely one聽is to vote “yes.”

Question No. 4 faces another hurdle besides opinion polls: Even if more voters start shifting toward approving it, passage requires 50 percent plus one of all ballots cast. Blank votes effectively count as “no” votes.

from

We need your help.

Unfortunately, being named a聽finalist for a聽Pulitzer prize聽doesn’t make us immune to financial pressures. The fact is,聽our revenue hasn鈥檛 kept pace with our need to grow,听.

Civil Beat is a nonprofit, reader-supported newsroom based in 贬补飞补颈驶颈. We鈥檙e looking to build a more resilient, diverse and deeply impactful media landscape, and聽we hope you鈥檒l help by .

About the Author