Mililani Trask is a candidate for the board of trustees of the Office of Hawaiian Affairs.

It is highly unlikely that the community is even aware that HECO, responding to pressure from the Public Utilities Commission (PUC), filed a Power Supply Improvement Plan (PSIP) in late August. The PSIP is currently open for .

The Honolulu Star-Advertiser called the plan a 鈥渟leep aid鈥 in a small item that told readers how important it was that they weighed in. But is it even credible to expect ordinary ratepayers to do so?

Here is what the PSIP consists of: a plan for Maui (715 pages), Hawaii Electric Light Power Supply Improvement Plan (415 pages), Hawaiian Electric Power Supply Improvement Plan (477 pages), Hawaiian Electric Companies鈥 Distributed Generation Interconnection Plan Book 1 (515 pages) and Hawaiian Electric Companies鈥 Distributed Generation Interconnection Plan Book 2 (609 pages.)

A HECO power plant.

PF Bentley/Civil Beat

HECO’s Aversion for the Digital Age

HECO is nothing if not consistent. When New Mexico put out an RFP for renewable energy it was 27 pages long and bidders could respond online. When HECO put out an RFP for geothermal energy it was 92 pages long with 11 appendices totaling 468 pages. Bidders had to provide five hard copies of their submissions. Submissions, of necessity, were two to three times the length of the RFP to provide the detail requested. No online option for submission was allowed.

If HECO cannot update its business processes to reflect our digital age, what confidence can we have in them leading Hawaii in the transition to the culture and technology of renewable energy?

I felt compelled to plow my way through the dense forest of the PSIP because I have been advocating for community-centered development of our vast geothermal resources for some years now. I have been following the issue of Hawaii鈥檚 dangerous dependence on imported fossil fuels 鈥 a habit that costs us $7 billion annually.

Imagine what that money could do if it remained in the state to help struggling farmers, stimulate small businesses, address our failing public schools, tackle homelessness and the other challenges we face daily in a place that is Paradise 鈥 for some.

My effort at scrutinizing the PSIP left me with tired eyes and dashed hopes.

Where are the specifics to which we can hold HECO accountable?

Where is the timetable with specific dates for the retirement of dinosaur grids?

Where is the commitment to developing renewable energy on at least some of the 1.5 million acres of public land?

Where is the road map that everyone can understand showing specific actions that will lead us to renewable energy self-sufficiency?

Hawaii Can鈥檛 Do What Burlington, Vermont Did?

Vermont鈥檚 largest town, has just announced that it will generate 100 percent of its electricity from renewable energy sources. We are told that Burlington鈥檚 achievement came about as a result of the state鈥檚 active commitment and 鈥渁 decade of planning.鈥

But decades of discussion with our monopoly utility have not moved us off our fossil fuel habit 鈥 and there is no sign they really want to.

Instead, in these islands where we have daily sun, wind, ocean and geothermal energy in abundance, HECO declares, almost unbelievably, 鈥淩enewable energy, while increasingly cost effective, can replace much, but not all of the fossil-fuel based generation because of its intermittent nature.鈥

If there is no will, there will be no way.

HECO鈥檚 PSIP does not reflect a will to transform our state of fossil fuel dependence to energy independence built firmly on our rich mix of renewable resources. The obstacles placed in the way of ready public understanding of the PSIP speaks to HECO鈥檚 way of doing business. The PSIP attests to HECO鈥檚 lack of interest in really communicating with the customers and policy-makers who have kept them in business since the entity first came into existence under the auspices of the It鈥檚 no mean feat that even while the Kingdom was taken over, Hawaiian Electric survived, and thrives. The people of Hawaii are literally the poorer for it.

Every campaign season we get tons of emails and commentary from people supporting or opposing particular candidates. Campaign Corner is a forum for healthy 鈥 and civil 鈥 discussion of candidates and their issues. Endorsements and criticisms are part of a voter鈥檚 decision-making process. Here are the ground rules: The column must be written by an identifiable person and accompanied by a current head shot and brief bio. The commentary must be original and not published elsewhere. No campaign email blasts. No letter-writing campaigns. Send columns and questions to news@civilbeat.org.聽The opinions and information expressed in Campaign Corner are solely those of the authors and not Civil Beat.

Support Independent, Unbiased News

Civil Beat is a nonprofit, reader-supported newsroom based in 贬补飞补颈驶颈. When you give, your donation is combined with gifts from thousands of your fellow readers, and together you help power the strongest team of investigative journalists in the state.

 

About the Author