The other day, we posted our district-by-district turnout percentages. Civil Beat member Dave Kozuki pointed out in the discussion that the district with the highest turnout — Aina Haina — also has been identified as the ZIP code with the .

Is there a connection between income and voter turnout?

Kozuki joked that maybe “voting will make you richer.” Hannah Miyamoto posited one theory: Upper-class people are often their own boss and can take time to vote whereas others cannot get time off from work. Nikki Love pointed us toward 2000 Census data, which this reporter mined to find the district-by-district per capita income for 1999. All the data is compiled in this handy chart:

District County Region Income Rank Turnout Rank
18 Honolulu Niu Valley, Aina Haina, Kahala $34,823 1 54.7% 1
19 Honolulu Waialae, Diamond Head, Kahala $34,612 2 54.3% 2
17 Honolulu Kalama Valley, Hawaii Kai $33,528 3 52.9% 4
26 Honolulu Pacific Heights, Pauoa, Punchbowl $28,091 4 51.2% 9
23 Honolulu Waikiki, Ala Moana $27,612 5 33.9% 41
24 Honolulu Manoa, Manoa Valley, University $27,285 6 52.7% 5
25 Honolulu Tantalus, Makiki, McCully $27,127 7 44.5% 18
49 Honolulu Maunawili, Enchanted Lake, Kaneohe $27,049 8 49.6% 13
20 Honolulu St. Louis, Palolo, Wilhelmina Rise $25,726 9 51.3% 8
11 Maui Makena, Wailea, Kihei $25,394 10 25.1% 50
21 Honolulu Kaimuki, Waikiki, Diamond Head $25,184 11 42.2% 23
10 Maui Lahaina, Kapalua,Kihei $25,051 12 22.7% 51
38 Honolulu Mililani, Mililani Mauka $24,957 13 50.2% 11
34 Honolulu Newtown, Waiau, Pearl City, Waimalu $24,846 14 54% 3
37 Honolulu Mililani, Waipio Gentry $24,640 15 49.3% 14
12 Maui Makawao, Olinda, Pulehu, Kula $24,540 16 40.7% 27
51 Honolulu Lanikai, Waimanalo $24,254 17 44.2% 20
6 Hawaii N. Kona, Keauhou, Kailua-Kona $23,699 18 32.8% 45
33 Honolulu Aiea, Halawa, Aiea Heights $23,698 19 51.9% 7
7 Hawaii N. Kona, S. Kohala $23,542 20 33.3% 44
31 Honolulu Moanalua Valley, Moanalua, Salt Lake $23,202 21 49.2% 15
50 Honolulu Kailua, Kaneohe Bay $23,039 22 43.2% 21
48 Honolulu Heeia, Haiku Valley, Kaneohe $22,745 23 52.1% 6
47 Honolulu Laie, Kaaawa, Kaneohe $22,627 24 44.4% 19
36 Honolulu Pearl City, Momilani, Pacific Palisades $22,245 25 50.5% 10
15 Kauai Lihue, Koloa $20,863 26 45.2% 17
14 Kauai Hanalei, Kapaa, Waipouli $20,533 27 39.4% 33
40 Honolulu Royal Kunia, Makakilo, Kapolei, Kalaeloa $20,389 28 36.8% 37
27 Honolulu Nuuanu, Puunui, Liliha, Alewa Heights $20,251 29 48.3% 16
41 Honolulu Waipahu, Village Park, Waikele $20,148 30 39.5% 32
9 Maui Kahului, Wailuku, Paia $19,687 31 41.6% 24
22 Honolulu Moiliili, McCully, Kaimuki $19,647 32 39.6% 30
16 Kauai Niihau, Lehua, Koloa, Waimea $19,507 33 43.2% 21
3 Hawaii S. Hilo, Puna, Keaau $19,458 34 49.9% 12
8 Maui Wailuku, Waihee, Waikapu $19,013 35 40.6% 28
13 Maui Kahoolawe, Lanai, Molokai, Hana $18,739 36 32.7% 47
28 Honolulu Palama, Downtown, Chinatown $18,512 37 37.3% 36
1 Hawaii Kohala, Hamakua, Hilo $17,974 38 39.6% 30
43 Honolulu Ewa Beach, Iroquois Point, Puuloa $17,177 39 33.6% 43
5 Hawaii Puna, Kau, S. Kona, N. Kona $17,049 40 40.5% 29
32 Honolulu Pearlridge, Aiea, Pearl Harbor $17,018 41 35.3% 40
2 Hawaii S. Hilo, Kaumana, Keaukaha $16,952 42 41.4% 25
35 Honolulu Pearl City, Waipahu $16,802 43 38.5% 35
42 Honolulu Waipahu, Honouliuli, West Loch, Ewa $16,644 44 35.5% 39
39 Honolulu Wahiawa, Whitmore Village, Poamoho $16,317 45 38.9% 34
30 Honolulu Kalihi Valley, Fort Shafter $15,997 46 40.9% 26
46 Honolulu North Shore, Schofield, Kunia $15,392 47 29.5% 49
29 Honolulu Sand Island, Mokauea, Kapalama $14,082 48 33.9% 41
44 Honolulu Honokai Hale, Nanakuli, Lualualei, Maili $13,782 49 30.8% 48
4 Hawaii Puna, Pahoa, Kalapana $13,698 50 36.3% 38
45 Honolulu Waianae, Makaha, Makua $13,269 51 32.8% 45

Source: Civil Beat analysis of election results and U.S. Census data

The parallels aren’t perfect, but the numbers show an obvious trend. Aina Haina is No. 1 in both turnout and income; Kahala is No. 2 in both. But while West Maui is 12th in income, it came in dead last (51st) in turnout. Why is that? Perhaps for the same reason that Waikiki underperformed relative to its income. Or that Wailea and Kihei did the same. High tourist areas have highly transient populations. Other reasons?

I pointed out in a comment that 1999 is a while ago in terms of making assumptions about current income data, and was also before the [pdf] redrew the boundaries for the state House districts.

I said in the discussion and I’ll say it again here: Isn’t it cool what we can all learn together?

Support Independent, Unbiased News

Civil Beat is a nonprofit, reader-supported newsroom based in ±á²¹·É²¹¾±Ê»¾±. When you give, your donation is combined with gifts from thousands of your fellow readers, and together you help power the strongest team of investigative journalists in the state.

 

About the Author